Literature DB >> 16804667

Treatment interruption in HIV therapy: a SMART strategy?

B Jülg1, F D Goebel.   

Abstract

Continuous HAART is standard of care for HIV-infected patients but lifelong adherence and tolerance are important concerns. Use of ART is associated with potential risks, e. g., adverse events, metabolic and cardiovascular complications, and HIV resistance. Stopping HIV therapy may reduce costs and side effects, but carries the risk of increased immune suppression and of emergence of resistance. Treatment interruption is a strategy of much interest, but its safety and efficacy have not been established. The clinical and biological characteristics that influence the outcome of structured treatment interruptions have not been fully clarified. In the following we will present the results of recent studies aimed to compare the long-term consequences of two antiretroviral-management strategies: continuous therapy versus scheduled treatment interruption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16804667     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-006-6306-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  3 in total

1.  Costs versus benefits: best possible and best practical treatment regimens for HIV.

Authors:  O Krakovska; L M Wahl
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Immune activation in the pathogenesis of treated chronic HIV disease: a workshop summary.

Authors:  Susan F Plaeger; Brenda S Collins; Runa Musib; Steven G Deeks; Sarah Read; Alan Embry
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.205

3.  Retroviral rebound syndrome after treatment discontinuation in a 15 year old girl with HIV attracted through mother-to-child transmission: case report.

Authors:  Vanda Friman; Magnus Gisslén
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.250

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.