Literature DB >> 16804643

Micro-vascular decompression for primary Trigeminal Neuralgia (typical or atypical). Long-term effectiveness on pain; prospective study with survival analysis in a consecutive series of 362 patients.

M Sindou1, J Leston, T Howeidy, E Decullier, F Chapuis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few publications on primary Trigeminal Neuralgia treated by Micro-Vascular Decompression (MVD) report large series, with long-term follow-up, using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis. None was specifically directed to the comparative study of MVD effectiveness on Trigeminal Neuralgia with typical (i.e., with paroxysmal pain only) and atypical features (i.e., with association of a permanent background of pain).
METHOD: The authors report a series of 362 patients having clearcut vascular compression and treated with pure MVD - i.e., without any additional cut or coagulation of the adjacent root fibers. Follow-up was 1 to 18 y (8 y on average, with a median of 7.2 y). Results were considered overall, then separately for patients with typical (237 (65.5%)) and atypical (125 (34.5%)) clinical presentation.
FINDINGS: One year after operation, (294 (81.2%) of patients were totally-free - of paroxysmal pain, and also of permanent background pain - and not needing any medication) 13 (3.6%) still had a background of pain but without the need for medication which 55 patients (15.2%), treatment had failed. At latest review (8 y on average) the corresponding rates were 80, 4.9 and 15.1%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the probability of total cure at 15 y to be 73.4%. There was no difference in the cure rate between patients with typical and atypical features at one year: 81 and 81.16%, respectively. The probability of cure at 15 y was identical for the two clinical presentations.
CONCLUSIONS: Pure MVD offers patients affected by Trigeminal Neuralgia due to vascular compression a long-lasting cure in three-fourths of the cases. Both typical and atypical presentations respond well to MVD, view in contrast to the classical view that an atypical presentation has an adverse effect on outcome after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16804643     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-006-0809-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  22 in total

1.  Postoperative complications of microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: lessons from experience of 2040 cases.

Authors:  Min Ho Lee; Tae Keun Jee; Jeong Ah Lee; Kwan Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of trigeminal ganglion for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression (MVD).

Authors:  Y Du; D Yang; X Dong; Q Du; H Wang; W Yu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  The role of sensory fiber demography in trigeminal and postherpetic neuralgias.

Authors:  A F DaSilva; M F DosSantos
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Pain Outcomes Following Microvascular Decompression for Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Holste; Alvin Y Chan; John D Rolston; Dario J Englot
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 5.  Nerve Compression Syndromes in the Posterior Cranial Fossa.

Authors:  Jörg Baldauf; Christian Rosenstengel; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of pediatric trigeminal neuralgia: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Matthew T Bender; Gustavo Pradilla; Carol James; Shaan Raza; Michael Lim; Benjamin S Carson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Imaging of Neurovascular Compression Syndromes: Trigeminal Neuralgia, Hemifacial Spasm, Vestibular Paroxysmia, and Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia.

Authors:  S Haller; L Etienne; E Kövari; A D Varoquaux; H Urbach; M Becker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Adverse Events After Microvascular Decompression: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

Authors:  David J Cote; Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; William B Gormley; Timothy R Smith; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 9.  Cranial neuralgias: from physiopathology to pharmacological treatment.

Authors:  Roberto De Simone; Angelo Ranieri; Leonilda Bilo; Chiara Fiorillo; Vincenzo Bonavita
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 10.  Teflon™ or Ivalon®: a scoping review of implants used in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Elliot Pressman; R Tushar Jha; Gleb Zavadskiy; Jay I Kumar; Harry van Loveren; Jamie J van Gompel; Siviero Agazzi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.