BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacing is a new therapy for the treatment of heart failure. However, a substantial number of patients do not respond to this therapy. HYPOTHESIS: Individually determined maximal pacing sites will improve the haemodynamic response and increase the number of responders. METHODS: In 48 patients with heart failure, the acute haemodynamic effects of nine different pacing configurations were studied, using two right and left ventricular pacing sites and their combinations. Cardiac index was measured using Doppler echocardiography. For further analysis, the combination with the highest cardiac index improvement was compared with baseline. Moreover, the number of responders was calculated using a cut-off value of 10% increase in cardiac index. RESULTS: The mean (SD) increase in cardiac index ranged between 3.8% (6.0%) and 11.1% (8.6%). The pacing site with maximal cardiac index was highly variable between patients, and here the cardiac index increased to 14.8% (7.6%; (p<0.001). The number of responders varied between 15% and 64%, increasing to 75% at the site with maximal increase in cardiac index. In a subset of patients, the haemodynamic improvement after pacemaker implantation correlated well with the acute haemodynamics. CONCLUSION: Individualisation of pacing configuration for biventricular pacing leads to further haemodynamic improvement in patients with heart failure and reduces the number of patients not responding to this therapy.
BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacing is a new therapy for the treatment of heart failure. However, a substantial number of patients do not respond to this therapy. HYPOTHESIS: Individually determined maximal pacing sites will improve the haemodynamic response and increase the number of responders. METHODS: In 48 patients with heart failure, the acute haemodynamic effects of nine different pacing configurations were studied, using two right and left ventricular pacing sites and their combinations. Cardiac index was measured using Doppler echocardiography. For further analysis, the combination with the highest cardiac index improvement was compared with baseline. Moreover, the number of responders was calculated using a cut-off value of 10% increase in cardiac index. RESULTS: The mean (SD) increase in cardiac index ranged between 3.8% (6.0%) and 11.1% (8.6%). The pacing site with maximal cardiac index was highly variable between patients, and here the cardiac index increased to 14.8% (7.6%; (p<0.001). The number of responders varied between 15% and 64%, increasing to 75% at the site with maximal increase in cardiac index. In a subset of patients, the haemodynamic improvement after pacemaker implantation correlated well with the acute haemodynamics. CONCLUSION: Individualisation of pacing configuration for biventricular pacing leads to further haemodynamic improvement in patients with heart failure and reduces the number of patients not responding to this therapy.
Authors: Sylvain Reuter; Stephane Garrigue; S Serge Barold; Pierre Jais; Meleze Hocini; Michel Haissaguerre; Jacques Clementy Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: M H Hamdan; J D Zagrodzky; J A Joglar; C J Sheehan; K Ramaswamy; J F Erdner; R L Page; M L Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-08-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W F Kerwin; E H Botvinick; J W O'Connell; S H Merrick; T DeMarco; K Chatterjee; K Scheibly; L A Saxon Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J J Blanc; Y Etienne; M Gilard; J Mansourati; S Munier; J Boschat; D G Benditt; K G Lurie Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-11-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C Alonso; C Leclercq; F Victor; H Mansour; C de Place; D Pavin; F Carré; P Mabo; J C Daubert Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1999-12-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Matthias Reumann; Dima Farina; Raz Miri; Stephan Lurz; Brigitte Osswald; Olaf Dössel Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2007-07-27 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Catherine M Albright; T Alexander Quinn; George Berberian; Santos E Cabreriza; Cara A Garofalo; Alan D Weinberg; Jose M Dizon; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.872