Philip Weinstein1, Rosamund Harrison, Tonya Benton. 1. Dental Public Health Sciences, University of Washington, School of Dentistry, Seattle, WA 98195-7475, USA. philw@u.washington.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a motivational interviewing (MI) counseling visit with traditional health education for mothers of young children at high risk of developing dental caries. METHODS: The authors enrolled 240 infants aged 6 to 18 months and their mothers in the study and randomly assigned them to MI or traditional health education (control) groups. Mothers in the control group received a pamphlet and watched a videotape. Those in the MI group received the pamphlet and watched the videotape, as well as received an MI counseling session and six follow-up telephone calls during the first year. There were no interventions in year 2. RESULTS: After two years, children in the MI group exhibited significantly less new caries (decayed or filled surfaces) than those in the control group (that is, a protective effect of MI) (odds ratio = 0.35, 95 percent confidence interval = 0.15 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: MI is a promising approach that warrants further attention in a variety of dental contexts. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study show that MI has a protective effect with regard to the development of early childhood caries. One reason for this clinical effect is greater compliance with recommended fluoride varnish treatment regimens in families who received MI counseling compared with families who received traditional education.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a motivational interviewing (MI) counseling visit with traditional health education for mothers of young children at high risk of developing dental caries. METHODS: The authors enrolled 240 infants aged 6 to 18 months and their mothers in the study and randomly assigned them to MI or traditional health education (control) groups. Mothers in the control group received a pamphlet and watched a videotape. Those in the MI group received the pamphlet and watched the videotape, as well as received an MI counseling session and six follow-up telephone calls during the first year. There were no interventions in year 2. RESULTS: After two years, children in the MI group exhibited significantly less new caries (decayed or filled surfaces) than those in the control group (that is, a protective effect of MI) (odds ratio = 0.35, 95 percent confidence interval = 0.15 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: MI is a promising approach that warrants further attention in a variety of dental contexts. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study show that MI has a protective effect with regard to the development of early childhood caries. One reason for this clinical effect is greater compliance with recommended fluoride varnish treatment regimens in families who received MI counseling compared with families who received traditional education.
Authors: R D DeBate; D Cragun; A A Gallentine; H H Severson; T Shaw; C Cantwell; S Christiansen; A Koerber; W Hendricson; S L Tomar; K McCormack Brown; L A Tedesco Journal: Eur J Dent Educ Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 2.355
Authors: Andrea M de Silva; Shalika Hegde; Bridget Akudo Nwagbara; Hanny Calache; Mark G Gussy; Mona Nasser; Hannah R Morrice; Elisha Riggs; Pamela M Leong; Lisa K Meyenn; Reza Yousefi-Nooraie Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-12-22
Authors: Andrea M de Silva; Shalika Hegde; Bridget Akudo Nwagbara; Hanny Calache; Mark G Gussy; Mona Nasser; Hannah R Morrice; Elisha Riggs; Pamela M Leong; Lisa K Meyenn; Reza Yousefi-Nooraie Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-09-15
Authors: Peter Milgrom; Marilynn Sutherland; R Mike Shirtcliff; Sharity Ludwig; Darlene Smolen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 3.295