Literature DB >> 16803503

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging of inguinofemoral lymph nodes in vulval cancer.

K Singh1, C O Orakwue, H Honest, M Balogun, C Lopez, D M Luesley.   

Abstract

Inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy contributes to the high morbidity related to surgical treatment of vulval cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting inguinofemoral lymph nodes metastasis in women with vulval cancer. We reviewed the clinical, MRI, surgical, and pathologic findings of 59 women with vulval cancer who were treated at our institution from January 2000 to June 2004. Histology was available for 39 women who had undergone inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Clinical and MRI findings were compared with histology result to assess test accuracy. MRI had a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 4.8 (95% confidence interval of 2.7-8.6) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.17 (0.06-0.49). It had a sensitivity of 85.7% (63.7-97), specificity of 82.1% (69.6-91.1), positive predictive value (PPV) of 64.3% (44.1-81.4), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.9% (83.1-98.7). Clinical examination had an LR+ of 6.1 (1.8-21.6) and LR- of 0.69 (0.5-0.96). It had a sensitivity of 35% (15.3-59.4), specificity of 94.3% (84.3-98.8), PPV of 70% (34.7-93.3), and NPV of 79.4% (67.3-88.5). Kappa statistics for interobserver and intraobserver agreement were 0.9091 and 0.8475, respectively. MRI assessment was accurate in predicting negative nodal status that is clinically useful in identifying women who can be spared inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. It is noninvasive and is superior to clinical assessment. In clinical practice, this should encourage toward nodal sparing surgery, thus lowering surgical-related patient morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16803503     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00456.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of vaginal and vulval pathology.

Authors:  N Griffin; L A Grant; E Sala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Vulvar Cancer and its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/059, November 2015.

Authors:  H G Schnürch; S Ackermann; C D Alt; J Barinoff; C Böing; C Dannecker; F Gieseking; A Günthert; P Hantschmann; L C Horn; R Kürzl; P Mallmann; S Marnitz; G Mehlhorn; C C Hack; M C Koch; U Torsten; W Weikel; L Wölber; M Hampl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Inguinal lymph nodes: size, number, and other characteristics in asymptomatic patients by CT.

Authors:  Nicholas Bontumasi; Jon A Jacobson; Elaine Caoili; Catherine Brandon; Sung Moon Kim; David Jamadar
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Groin lymph node detection and sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Chieko Sakae; Ken Yamaguchi; Noriomi Matsumura; Hidekatsu Nakai; Yumiko Yoshioka; Eiji Kondoh; Junzo Hamanishi; Kaoru Abiko; Masafumi Koshiyama; Tsukasa Baba; Aki Kido; Masaki Mandai; Ikuo Konishi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  The Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Debora Verri; Francesca Moro; Simona Maria Fragomeni; Drieda Zaçe; Sonia Bove; Federica Pozzati; Benedetta Gui; Giovanni Scambia; Antonia Carla Testa; Giorgia Garganese
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  State of the art in vulvar cancer imaging.

Authors:  Maria Ana Serrado; Mariana Horta; Teresa Margarida Cunha
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.