Literature DB >> 16803473

Prognostic significance of tumor necrosis in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical debulking.

T Le1, P Shahriari, L Hopkins, W Faught, M Fung Kee Fung.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to study the significance of tumor necrosis documented at the time of interval surgical debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Retrospective chart reviews were carried out from 1997 to 2005 to identify ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients' demographics together with disease characteristics, treatment-related variables, and outcomes were recorded. Cox proportional hazard models were built to model time to progression using predictor variables such as age, cancer stage, tumor grade, residual disease, percentage change in CA125 level from baseline, and degree of necrosis in resected tumor specimens. One hundred one patients were included in the study. Optimal debulking was achieved in 74% of the patients. Cox regressions revealed three significant predictive variables of time to first progression: younger age (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, P= 0.004), residual disease (P= 0.048), and the absence/minimal tumor necrosis after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.01-3.87, P= 0.048). The estimated median survival was 50.66 months (95% CI 46.12-55.20). The lack of or minimal tumor necrosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent risk factor for recurrent disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16803473     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00594.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  4 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with serous endometrial cancer with transperitoneal spread (stage IV): a new preferred treatment?

Authors:  I Vandenput; B Van Calster; A Capoen; K Leunen; P Berteloot; P Neven; Ph Moerman; I Vergote; F Amant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Clinicopathologic study in uterine cancer.

Authors:  I Vandenput
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2011

3.  Fibronectin and Periostin as Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Katarzyna Aleksandra Kujawa; Ewa Zembala-Nożyńska; Alexander Jorge Cortez; Tomasz Kujawa; Jolanta Kupryjańczyk; Katarzyna Marta Lisowska
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant treatment for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: where do we stand and where are we going?

Authors:  Michele Moschetta; Stergios Boussios; Elie Rassy; Eleftherios P Samartzis; Gabriel Funingana; Mario Uccello
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.