Literature DB >> 16802878

The soft constraints hypothesis: a rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior.

Wayne D Gray1, Chris R Sims, Wai-Tat Fu, Michael J Schoelles.   

Abstract

Soft constraints hypothesis (SCH) is a rational analysis approach that holds that the mixture of perceptual-motor and cognitive resources allocated for interactive behavior is adjusted based on temporal cost-benefit tradeoffs. Alternative approaches maintain that cognitive resources are in some sense protected or conserved in that greater amounts of perceptual-motor effort will be expended to conserve lesser amounts of cognitive effort. One alternative, the minimum memory hypothesis (MMH), holds that people favor strategies that minimize the use of memory. SCH is compared with MMH across 3 experiments and with predictions of an Ideal Performer Model that uses ACT-R's memory system in a reinforcement learning approach that maximizes expected utility by minimizing time. Model and data support the SCH view of resource allocation; at the under 1000-ms level of analysis, mixtures of cognitive and perceptual-motor resources are adjusted based on their cost-benefit tradeoffs for interactive behavior. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16802878     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  32 in total

Review 1.  Navigating complex decision spaces: Problems and paradigms in sequential choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  The influence of training and experience on memory strategy.

Authors:  John Patrick; Phillip L Morgan; Victoria Smy; Leyanne Tiley; Helen Seeby; Tanya Patrick; Jonathan Evans
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-07

3.  Does task sustainability provide a unified measure of subjective task difficulty?

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Bill V Bui
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

4.  Tied to expectations: Predicting features speeds processing even under adverse circumstances.

Authors:  Sabine Schwager; Robert Gaschler; Dennis Rünger; Peter A Frensch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

5.  How are cognitive and physical difficulty compared?

Authors:  Cory Adam Potts; Stefan Pastel; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Victor Mittelstädt; David Dignath; Magdalena Schmidt-Ott; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-04

7.  Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Nisha Raghunath; Lisa R Fournier; Clark Kogan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-20

8.  Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.

Authors:  Victor Mittelstädt; Jeff Miller; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

9.  Giving up problem solving.

Authors:  Stephen J Payne; Geoffrey B Duggan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

10.  The strategic nature of changing your mind.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.