Literature DB >> 16802326

CDC-funded intervention research aimed at promoting colorectal cancer screening in communities.

Steven S Coughlin1, Mary E Costanza, Maria E Fernandez, Karen Glanz, Judith W Lee, Selina A Smith, Leonardo Stroud, Irene Tessaro, John M Westfall, Joel L Weissfeld, Daniel S Blumenthal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although strong scientific evidence has shown that screening for colorectal cancer saves lives, most U.S. adults who are at the recommended age are not being screened. Prior studies suggest that barriers to routine screening vary by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, urban/rural residence, health insurance status, and factors related to health care providers and the health care environment. Relatively few studies, however, have identified and tested intervention approaches to promote routine colorectal cancer screening among diverse populations.
METHODS: The Division of Cancer Prevention and Control at CDC has funded ongoing projects to develop and test interventions to promote routine colorectal cancer screening among medically underserved populations in Appalachia, the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas, the High Plains region of Colorado, and other U.S. communities.
RESULTS: This article provides an overview of colorectal cancer screening intervention studies currently funded by CDC that focus on a wide range of populations, including medically underserved persons who live in predominately rural areas, Hispanic and non-Hispanic persons, urban African Americans, persons with low health literacy, and persons enrolled in managed care organizations.
CONCLUSIONS: These CDC-funded intervention research projects are likely to contribute importantly to evidence about what works to promote colorectal cancer screening in diverse U.S. communities. .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16802326     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  Gender differences in colorectal cancer incidence in the United States, 1975-2006.

Authors:  Peter N Abotchie; Sally W Vernon; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention to increase CRC screening rates in the African American community: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Errol J Philip; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Colorectal cancer and rectal bleeding in primary care: urban or rural myth?

Authors:  Sanjay Purkayastha; Ara Darzi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-22

4.  Predictors of compliance with free endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in uninsured adults.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Richard H Fortinsky; Alison Kleppinger; Amanda B Merz-Beyus; Charles G Huntington; Suzanne Lagarde
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Boot camp translation: a method for building a community of solution.

Authors:  Ned Norman; Chris Bennett; Shirley Cowart; Maret Felzien; Martha Flores; Rafael Flores; Connie Haynes; Mike Hernandez; Mary Petra Rodriquez; Norah Sanchez; Sergio Sanchez; Kathy Winkelman; Steve Winkelman; Linda Zittleman; John M Westfall
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Testing to prevent colon cancer: results from a rural community intervention.

Authors:  John M Westfall; Linda Zittleman; Christin Sutter; Caroline B Emsermann; Elizabeth W Staton; Rebecca Van Vorst; L Miriam Dickinson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Testing to prevent colon cancer: how rural community members took on a community-based intervention.

Authors:  Ned Norman; Shirley Cowart; Maret Felzien; Connie Haynes; Mike Hernandez; Mary Petra Rodriquez; Norah Sanchez; Sergio Sanchez; Kathy Winkelman; Steve Winkelman; Rebecca Van Vorst; Linda Zittleman; John M Westfall
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Himabindu Kadiyala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Anila Shethia; Hashem El-Serag; Annette Walder; Maria E Velez; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Evidence-based interventions and screening recommendations for colorectal cancer in comprehensive cancer control plans: a content analysis.

Authors:  Julie S Townsend; Lisa C Richardson; C Brooke Steele; Dana E White
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Radiation therapy resources and guideline-concordant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer patients in an underserved region.

Authors:  Nengliang Yao; Stephen A Matthews; Marianne M Hillemeier; Roger T Anderson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.