OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of thiazolidinedione treatment on subclinical atherosclerosis progression in insulin-requiring patients with clinical characteristics suggesting type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eligible participants (n = 299) were randomized within strata of baseline common carotid artery (CCA) intima-media thickness (IMT) (<0.8 mm, >or=0.8 mm) to 400 mg troglitazone daily or placebo for 2 years. A general linear mixed-effects model was used to compare the rate of change in CCA-IMT between treatment groups. RESULTS: Overall, average rates of CCA-IMT change were not significantly different between troglitazone- and placebo-treated subjects (0.0030 +/- 0.021 vs. 0.0066 +/- 0.021 mm/year; P = 0.17). In the stratum of subjects with CCA-IMT >or=0.8 mm, troglitazone significantly reduced the progression of CCA-IMT relative to placebo (0.0013 +/- 0.022 vs. 0.0084 +/- 0.023 mm/year; P = 0.03). Fasting glucose, insulin, and HbA(1c) were significantly lower in troglitazone- versus placebo-treated subjects (P < 0.01). Whereas blood pressure significantly differed between treatment groups in the >or=0.8-mm stratum, there was no difference between treatment groups in the <0.8-mm stratum. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin sensitization and reduction in blood pressure may be contributory mechanisms by which troglitazone reduced subclinical atherosclerosis progression in this cohort of well-controlled insulin-dependent patients with clinical characteristics suggesting type 2 diabetes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of thiazolidinedione treatment on subclinical atherosclerosis progression in insulin-requiring patients with clinical characteristics suggesting type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eligible participants (n = 299) were randomized within strata of baseline common carotid artery (CCA) intima-media thickness (IMT) (<0.8 mm, >or=0.8 mm) to 400 mg troglitazone daily or placebo for 2 years. A general linear mixed-effects model was used to compare the rate of change in CCA-IMT between treatment groups. RESULTS: Overall, average rates of CCA-IMT change were not significantly different between troglitazone- and placebo-treated subjects (0.0030 +/- 0.021 vs. 0.0066 +/- 0.021 mm/year; P = 0.17). In the stratum of subjects with CCA-IMT >or=0.8 mm, troglitazone significantly reduced the progression of CCA-IMT relative to placebo (0.0013 +/- 0.022 vs. 0.0084 +/- 0.023 mm/year; P = 0.03). Fasting glucose, insulin, and HbA(1c) were significantly lower in troglitazone- versus placebo-treated subjects (P < 0.01). Whereas blood pressure significantly differed between treatment groups in the >or=0.8-mm stratum, there was no difference between treatment groups in the <0.8-mm stratum. CONCLUSIONS:Insulin sensitization and reduction in blood pressure may be contributory mechanisms by which troglitazone reduced subclinical atherosclerosis progression in this cohort of well-controlled insulin-dependent patients with clinical characteristics suggesting type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Md Sahab Uddin; Md Tanvir Kabir; Md Jakaria; Abdullah Al Mamun; Kamal Niaz; Md Shah Amran; George E Barreto; Ghulam Md Ashraf Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 3.911
Authors: Erin Foran Wolff; Yunxiao He; Dennis M Black; Eliot A Brinton; Mathew J Budoff; Marcelle I Cedars; Howard N Hodis; Rogerio A Lobo; Joann E Manson; George R Merriam; Virginia M Miller; Fredrick Naftolin; Lubna Pal; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang; S Mitchell Harman; Hugh S Taylor Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Thomas H Schindler; Alvaro D Facta; John O Prior; Jerson Cadenas; Xiao-Li Zhang; Yanjie Li; James Sayre; Jonathan Goldin; Heinrich R Schelbert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Thomas H Schindler; Jerson Cadenas; Alvaro D Facta; Yanjie Li; Manfred Olschewski; James Sayre; Jonathan Goldin; Heinrich R Schelbert Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Peter Willeit; Lena Tschiderer; Michael J Sweeting; Simon G Thompson; Matthias W Lorenz; Elias Allara; Kathrin Reuber; Lisa Seekircher; Lu Gao; Ximing Liao; Eva Lonn; Hertzel C Gerstein; Salim Yusuf; Frank P Brouwers; Folkert W Asselbergs; Wiek van Gilst; Sigmund A Anderssen; Diederick E Grobbee; John J P Kastelein; Frank L J Visseren; George Ntaios; Apostolos I Hatzitolios; Christos Savopoulos; Pythia T Nieuwkerk; Erik Stroes; Matthew Walters; Peter Higgins; Jesse Dawson; Paolo Gresele; Giuseppe Guglielmini; Rino Migliacci; Marat Ezhov; Maya Safarova; Tatyana Balakhonova; Eiichi Sato; Mayuko Amaha; Tsukasa Nakamura; Kostas Kapellas; Lisa M Jamieson; Michael Skilton; James A Blumenthal; Alan Hinderliter; Andrew Sherwood; Patrick J Smith; Michiel A van Agtmael; Peter Reiss; Marit G A van Vonderen; Stefan Kiechl; Gerhard Klingenschmid; Matthias Sitzer; Coen D A Stehouwer; Heiko Uthoff; Zhi-Yong Zou; Ana R Cunha; Mario F Neves; Miles D Witham; Hyun-Woong Park; Moo-Sik Lee; Jang-Ho Bae; Enrique Bernal; Kristian Wachtell; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael H Olsen; David Preiss; Naveed Sattar; Edith Beishuizen; Menno V Huisman; Mark A Espeland; Caroline Schmidt; Stefan Agewall; Ercan Ok; Gülay Aşçi; Eric de Groot; Muriel P C Grooteman; Peter J Blankestijn; Michiel L Bots Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 29.690