OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the 4-week healing rate to predict complete healing over a 12-week period in a large prospective multicenter trial of diabetic patients with foot ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the change in ulcer area over a 4-week period as a predictor of wound healing within 12 weeks in patients who were seen weekly in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. RESULTS:Wound area measurements at baseline and after 4 weeks were performed in 203 patients. The midpoint between the percentage area reduction from baseline at 4 weeks in patients healed versus those not healed at 12 weeks was found to be 53%. Subjects with a reduction in ulcer area greater than the 4-week median had a 12-week healing rate of 58%, whereas those with reduction in ulcer area less than the 4-week median had a healing rate of only 9% (P < 0.01). The absolute change in ulcer area at 4 weeks was significantly greater in healers versus nonhealers (1.5 versus 0.8 cm2, P < 0.02). The percent change in wound area at 4 weeks in those who healed was 82% (95% CI 70-94), whereas in those who failed to heal, the percent change in wound area was 25% (15-35; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The percent change in foot ulcer area after 4 weeks of observation is a robust predictor of healing at 12 weeks. This simple tool may serve as a pivotal clinical decision point in the care of diabetic foot ulcers for early identification of patients who may not respond to standard care and may need additional treatment.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the 4-week healing rate to predict complete healing over a 12-week period in a large prospective multicenter trial of diabeticpatients with foot ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the change in ulcer area over a 4-week period as a predictor of wound healing within 12 weeks in patients who were seen weekly in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. RESULTS: Wound area measurements at baseline and after 4 weeks were performed in 203 patients. The midpoint between the percentage area reduction from baseline at 4 weeks in patients healed versus those not healed at 12 weeks was found to be 53%. Subjects with a reduction in ulcer area greater than the 4-week median had a 12-week healing rate of 58%, whereas those with reduction in ulcer area less than the 4-week median had a healing rate of only 9% (P < 0.01). The absolute change in ulcer area at 4 weeks was significantly greater in healers versus nonhealers (1.5 versus 0.8 cm2, P < 0.02). The percent change in wound area at 4 weeks in those who healed was 82% (95% CI 70-94), whereas in those who failed to heal, the percent change in wound area was 25% (15-35; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The percent change in foot ulcer area after 4 weeks of observation is a robust predictor of healing at 12 weeks. This simple tool may serve as a pivotal clinical decision point in the care of diabetic foot ulcers for early identification of patients who may not respond to standard care and may need additional treatment.
Authors: Jessica D Bills; Sandra J Berriman; Debby L Noble; Lawrence A Lavery; Kathryn E Davis Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Kathryn E Davis; Fadi C Constantine; Elaine C Macaslan; Jessica D Bills; Debby L Noble; Lawrence A Lavery Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2013-09-01
Authors: Dirk T Ubbink; Robert Lindeboom; Anne M Eskes; Huub Brull; Dink A Legemate; Hester Vermeulen Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Robert S Kirsner; Greg Bohn; Vickie R Driver; Joseph L Mills; Lillian B Nanney; Marie L Williams; Stephanie C Wu Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: José I Fernández-Montequín; Carmen M Valenzuela-Silva; Odalys González Díaz; William Savigne; Natasha Sancho-Soutelo; Fidel Rivero-Fernández; Pablo Sánchez-Penton; Lourdes Morejón-Vega; Heriberto Artaza-Sanz; Arístides García-Herrera; Cecilio González-Benavides; Carlos M Hernández-Cañete; Alberto Vázquez-Proenza; Jorge Berlanga-Acosta; Pedro A López-Saura Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.315