BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are one of the most frequent causes of iatrogenic injury. Because International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes are routinely assigned to inpatient discharges, they could provide a method to detect ADEs within a hospital, a state, and the nation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine validity of selected ICD-9-CM codes in identifying inpatient ADEs. RESEARCH DESIGN: An expert panel identified 416 ICD-9-CM codes to represent ADEs (flagged ADE codes). Retrospective chart review using a structured tool was performed to ascertain code performance in detecting ADEs. SUBJECTS: Subjects included 3103 inpatients from all 41 acute care hospitals in Utah in 2001: 1961 inpatients sampled randomly (random sample) and 1142 inpatients sampled from the discharge records with at least one flagged ADE code (flagged sample). MEASURES: Measures were ADEs identified by structured review. RESULTS: The flagged sample yielded 1122 flagged ADE codes recorded in patient charts with 704 representing ADEs (63%). Two hundred eighty-six of the 704 verified ADE codes (41%) were determined to be inpatient ADEs. In the random sample, 32 of 58 ADEs (55%) causing hospital admission were detected by the ADE-flagged codes. Only 23 of 224 inpatient ADEs had been assigned a flagged ADE code (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Flagged ADE codes have an overall positive predictive value of 63% and detect just over half of ADEs causing hospital admission. These codes have a positive predictive value of 25% for inpatient ADEs but detect only 10% of overall inpatient ADEs. Flagged ADE codes provide an imperfect but immediately available ADE surveillance system.
BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are one of the most frequent causes of iatrogenic injury. Because International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes are routinely assigned to inpatient discharges, they could provide a method to detect ADEs within a hospital, a state, and the nation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine validity of selected ICD-9-CM codes in identifying inpatient ADEs. RESEARCH DESIGN: An expert panel identified 416 ICD-9-CM codes to represent ADEs (flagged ADE codes). Retrospective chart review using a structured tool was performed to ascertain code performance in detecting ADEs. SUBJECTS: Subjects included 3103 inpatients from all 41 acute care hospitals in Utah in 2001: 1961 inpatients sampled randomly (random sample) and 1142 inpatients sampled from the discharge records with at least one flagged ADE code (flagged sample). MEASURES: Measures were ADEs identified by structured review. RESULTS: The flagged sample yielded 1122 flagged ADE codes recorded in patient charts with 704 representing ADEs (63%). Two hundred eighty-six of the 704 verified ADE codes (41%) were determined to be inpatient ADEs. In the random sample, 32 of 58 ADEs (55%) causing hospital admission were detected by the ADE-flagged codes. Only 23 of 224 inpatient ADEs had been assigned a flagged ADE code (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Flagged ADE codes have an overall positive predictive value of 63% and detect just over half of ADEs causing hospital admission. These codes have a positive predictive value of 25% for inpatient ADEs but detect only 10% of overall inpatient ADEs. Flagged ADE codes provide an imperfect but immediately available ADE surveillance system.
Authors: Foster R Goss; Kenneth H Lai; Maxim Topaz; Warren W Acker; Leigh Kowalski; Joseph M Plasek; Kimberly G Blumenthal; Diane L Seger; Sarah P Slight; Kin Wah Fung; Frank Y Chang; David W Bates; Li Zhou Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Corinne M Hohl; Lisa Kuramoto; Eugenia Yu; Basia Rogula; Jürgen Stausberg; Boris Sobolev Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 2.655