Literature DB >> 16799112

Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of junior elite volleyball players.

M J Duncan1, L Woodfield, Y al-Nakeeb.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the anthropometric and physiological characteristics of junior elite volleyball players.
METHOD: Twenty five national level volleyball players (mean (SD) age 17.5 (0.5) years) were assessed on a number of physiological and anthropometric variables. Somatotype was assessed using the Heath-Carter method, body composition (% body fat, % muscle mass) was assessed using surface anthropometry, leg strength was assessed using a leg and back dynamometer, low back and hamstring flexibility was assessed using the sit and reach test, and the vertical jump was used as a measure of lower body power. Maximal oxygen uptake was predicted using the 20 m multistage fitness test.
RESULTS: Setters were more ectomorphic (p<0.05) and less mesomorphic (p<0.01) than centres. Mean (SD) of somatotype (endomorphy, mesomorphy, ectomorphy) for setters and centres was 2.6 (0.9), 1.9 (1.1), 5.3 (1.2) and 2.2 (0.8), 3.9 (1.1), 3.6 (0.7) respectively. Hitters had significantly greater low back and hamstring flexibility than opposites. Mean (SD) for sit and reach was 19.3 (8.3) cm for opposites and 37 (10.7) cm for hitters. There were no other significant differences in physiological and anthropometric variables across playing positions (all p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Setters tend to be endomorphic ectomorphs, hitters and opposites tend to be balanced ectomorphs, whereas centres tend to be ectomorphic mesomorphs. These results indicate the need for sports scientists and conditioning professionals to take the body type of volleyball players into account when designing individualised position specific training programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16799112      PMCID: PMC2564319          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.021998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  6 in total

1.  Investigation of anthropometric and work-rate profiles of Rugby Sevens players.

Authors:  E Rienzi; T Reilly; C Malkin
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.637

2.  Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of amateur rugby league players.

Authors:  T J Gabbett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Anthropometric estimation of muscle mass in men.

Authors:  A D Martin; L F Spenst; D T Drinkwater; J P Clarys
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Somatotype, role and performance in elite volleyball players.

Authors:  E Gualdi-Russo; L Zaccagni
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Physiological profile in relation to playing position of elite college Gaelic footballers.

Authors:  M C McIntyre; M Hall
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years.

Authors:  J V Durnin; J Womersley
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.718

  6 in total
  16 in total

1.  Anthropometric characteristics, physical fitness and motor coordination of 9 to 11 year old children participating in a wide range of sports.

Authors:  Katrijn Opstoel; Johan Pion; Marije Elferink-Gemser; Esther Hartman; Bas Willemse; Renaat Philippaerts; Chris Visscher; Matthieu Lenoir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Characteristics and contributing factors related to sports injuries in young volleyball players.

Authors:  Franciele Marques Vanderlei; Fabio Nascimento Bastos; Gustavo Yuki Cantalejo Tsutsumi; Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei; Jayme Netto Júnior; Carlos Marcelo Pastre
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-10-14

3.  Effects of Plyometric Training on Physical Fitness in Team Sport Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maamer Slimani; Karim Chamari; Bianca Miarka; Fabricio B Del Vecchio; Foued Chéour
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Somatotype, Level of Competition, and Performance in Attack in Elite Male Volleyball.

Authors:  Nikiforos Giannopoulos; George Vagenas; Konstantinos Noutsos; Karolina Barzouka; Nikolaos Bergeles
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Anthropometric and physical characteristics allow differentiation of young female volleyball players according to playing position and level of expertise.

Authors:  M Milić; Z Grgantov; K Chamari; L P Ardigò; A Bianco; J Padulo
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.806

6.  Somatic profile of competitive sport climbers.

Authors:  Paweł Tomaszewski; Jan Gajewski; Joanna Lewandowska
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Classification of selected cardiopulmonary variables of elite athletes of different age, gender, and disciplines during incremental exercise testing.

Authors:  Christoph Zinner; Billy Sperlich; Patrick Wahl; Joachim Mester
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-09-24

8.  Analysis of the response speed of musculature of the knee in professional male and female volleyball players.

Authors:  D Rodríguez-Ruiz; I Diez-Vega; D Rodríguez-Matoso; M Fernandez-del-Valle; R Sagastume; J J Molina
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Anthropometric Profiling of New Zealand Junior Elite Triathletes.

Authors:  Bhargav Dave; Asmi Dave; Nilesh Kotecha; Myrtle Oates
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-06-25

10.  Training-induced changes in physical performance can be achieved without body mass reduction after eight week of strength and injury prevention oriented programme in volleyball female players.

Authors:  M Lehnert; M Sigmund; P Lipinska; R Vařeková; M Hroch; Z Xaverová; P Stastny; P Háp; P Zmijewski
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 2.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.