Literature DB >> 16798296

Risk factor identification and mortality prediction in cardiac surgery using artificial neural networks.

Johan Nilsson1, Mattias Ohlsson, Lars Thulin, Peter Höglund, Samer A M Nashef, Johan Brandt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The artificial neural network model is a nonlinear technology useful for complex pattern recognition problems. This study aimed to develop a method to select risk variables and predict mortality after cardiac surgery by using artificial neural networks.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 18,362 patients undergoing cardiac surgery at 128 European institutions in 1995 (the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation database) were used. Models to predict the operative mortality were constructed using artificial neural networks. For calibration a sixfold cross-validation technique was used, and for testing a fourfold cross-testing was performed. Risk variables were ranked and minimized in number by calibrated artificial neural networks. Mortality prediction with 95% confidence limits for each patient was obtained by the bootstrap technique. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was used as a quantitative measure of the ability to distinguish between survivors and nonsurvivors. Subgroup analysis of surgical operation categories was performed. The results were compared with those from logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation analysis.
RESULTS: The operative mortality was 4.9%. Artificial neural networks selected 34 of the total 72 risk variables as relevant for mortality prediction. The receiver operating characteristics area for artificial neural networks (0.81) was larger than the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation model (0.79; P = .0001). For different surgical operation categories, there were no differences in the discriminatory power for the artificial neural networks (P = .15) but significant differences were found for the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (P = .0072).
CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors in a ranked order contributing to the mortality prediction were identified. A minimal set of risk variables achieving a superior mortality prediction was defined. The artificial neural network model is applicable independent of the cardiac surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16798296     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.12.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  21 in total

1.  Continuous evolution of risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention.

Authors:  Hoda Javadikasgari; A Marc Gillinov
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Artificial intelligence and automation in valvular heart diseases.

Authors:  Qiang Long; Xiaofeng Ye; Qiang Zhao
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Predicting ideal outcome after pediatric liver transplantation: An exploratory study using machine learning analyses to leverage Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation Data.

Authors:  Sharad Indur Wadhwani; Evelyn K Hsu; Michele L Shaffer; Ravinder Anand; Vicky Lee Ng; John C Bucuvalas
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2019-07-22

4.  Pre-operative prediction of surgical morbidity in children: comparison of five statistical models.

Authors:  Jennifer N Cooper; Lai Wei; Soledad A Fernandez; Peter C Minneci; Katherine J Deans
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Associations between preoperative continuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a propensity score-matching analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Chou; Tao-Min Huang; Vin-Cent Wu; Wei-Shan Chen; Chih-Hsien Wang; Nai-Kuan Chou; Wen-Chih Chiang; Tzong-Shinn Chu; Shuei-Liong Lin
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  FIASCO II failure to achieve a satisfactory cardiac outcome study: the elimination of system errors.

Authors:  Shakil Farid; Aravinda Page; David Jenkins; Mark T Jones; Darren Freed; Samer A M Nashef
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-16

7.  Prediction of malignant breast lesions from MRI features: a comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression techniques.

Authors:  Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Ke Nie; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Artificial neural networks versus multiple logistic regression to predict 30-day mortality after operations for type a ascending aortic dissection.

Authors:  Francesco Macrina; Paolo Emilio Puddu; Alfonso Sciangula; Fausto Trigilia; Marco Totaro; Fabio Miraldi; Francesca Toscano; Mauro Cassese; Michele Toscano
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2009-07-07

Review 9.  Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention.

Authors:  Nassir M Thalji; Rakesh M Suri; Kevin L Greason; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Long-term mortality prediction after operations for type A ascending aortic dissection.

Authors:  Francesco Macrina; Paolo E Puddu; Alfonso Sciangula; Marco Totaro; Fausto Trigilia; Mauro Cassese; Michele Toscano
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.