Literature DB >> 16797683

Uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumors should not be included in studies of endometrial carcinoma.

Ami P Vaidya1, Neil S Horowitz, Esther Oliva, Elkan F Halpern, Linda R Duska.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Uterine mixed malignant mullerian tumors (MMMT) have traditionally been excluded from clinical trials of endometrial cancer because of a belief that they are more correctly included in the sarcoma category. Recently, investigators have suggested that uterine MMMTs are actually dedifferentiated epithelial tumors and should be treated as such. The current study was undertaken to compare outcomes, stage for stage, of uterine MMMT with poor prognosis endometrial adenocarcinomas.
METHODS: Cases of MMMT from 1996 to 2004 were identified from the Tumor Registry after IRB consent was obtained. Retrospective chart review was performed. Cases were matched by age, stage, performance status, and surgical procedure to controls consisting of grade 3 endometrioid, papillary serous, and clear cell endometrial carcinomas from the same time period. Overall survival was compared using the Log-Rank test.
RESULTS: 68 patients with MMMT were identified. 23 were excluded due to incomplete records. Patients with MMMT ranged in age from 51 to 95 years (mean 75.3 years). Approximately half of the patients (53%) had stage III or IV disease. Of the controls, 31 (69%) had grade 3 endometrioid, 11 (24%) papillary serous, and 3 (7%) clear cell carcinoma. Median overall survival for all patients with MMMT was significantly shorter than for controls, 18 months (range 0.5-72) versus 36 months (range 0.5-123) (P = 0.02). Patients with early stage disease (stage I or II) had shorter median survival than controls, 26 months (range 3-7) vs. 95 months (range 4-123) (P = 0.003). There was no difference in median survival when comparing advanced disease (stage III or IV) to matched controls, 15 months (range 0.5-70) vs. 19 months (range 0.5-100) (P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with uterine MMMT have a poorer prognosis than those patients with high grade epithelial tumors, especially for those with early stage disease. Given the discrepancy in survival, these patients should not be included in studies of endometrial carcinoma. Further investigations are necessary to identify factors to improve survival of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16797683     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

1.  Molecular and clinicopathological analyses of esophageal carcinosarcoma with special reference to morphological change.

Authors:  Sho Tsuyama; Tsuyoshi Saito; Yoichi Akazawa; Yuka Yanai; Noboru Yatagai; Keisuke Akaike; Takuo Hayashi; Yoshiyuki Suehara; Fumiyuki Takahashi; Kazuya Takamochi; Takashi Hashimoto; Yoshiaki Kajiyama; Masahiko Tsurumaru; Tetsu Fukunaga; Takashi Yao
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?

Authors:  Taejong Song; Chel Hun Choi; Yoo-Young Lee; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Serous carcinomatous component championed by heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) predisposing to metastasis and recurrence in stage I uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumor.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; David Shimizu; Jeffrey L Killeen; Stacey A Honda; Di Lu; Alexander Stanoyevitch; Fritz Lin; Beverly Wang; Edwin S Monuki; Michele Carbone
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 4.  Review of Recommended Treatment of Uterine Carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Joseph Menczer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-11

5.  Genetics of endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Okuda; Akihiko Sekizawa; Yuditiya Purwosunu; Masaaki Nagatsuka; Miki Morioka; Masaki Hayashi; Takashi Okai
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-04-08

6.  Malignant mixed Mullerian tumors of the uterus: histopathological evaluation of cell cycle and apoptotic regulatory proteins.

Authors:  Rani Kanthan; Jenna-Lynn B Senger; Dana Diudea
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Primary retroperitoneal mullerian adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ayman Elnemr; Yutaka Yonemura; Masaya Shinbo; Eisei Nishino
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2010-03-31

8.  [Carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed Mullerian tumors) of the uterus. Morphology, pathogenetic aspects and prognostic factors].

Authors:  L-C Horn; M Dallacker; K Bilek
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 9.  Treatment of early uterine sarcomas: disentangling adjuvant modalities.

Authors:  Flora Zagouri; Athanasios-Meletios Dimopoulos; Stelios Fotiou; Vassilios Kouloulias; Christos A Papadimitriou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  The influence of adjuvant radiotherapy on patterns of failure and survivals in uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Hae Jin Park; Hak Jae Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu; Hans Kim; Sung Whan Ha; Soon-Beom Kang; Yong-Sang Song; Noh-Hyun Park; Jae-Won Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2011-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.