Literature DB >> 16797072

Ecosystem carbon budgeting and soil carbon sequestration in reclaimed mine soil.

Raj K Shrestha1, Rattan Lal.   

Abstract

Global warming risks from emissions of green house gases (GHGs) by anthropogenic activities, and possible mitigation strategies of terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration have increased the need for the identification of ecosystems with high C sink capacity. Depleted soil organic C (SOC) pools of reclaimed mine soil (RMS) ecosystems can be restored through conversion to an appropriate land use and adoption of recommended management practices (RMPs). The objectives of this paper are to (1) synthesize available information on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from coal mining and combustion activities, (2) understand mechanisms of SOC sequestration and its protection, (3) identify factors affecting C sequestration potential in RMSs, (4) review available methods for the estimation of ecosystem C budget (ECB), and (5) identify knowledge gaps to enhance C sink capacity of RMS ecosystems and prioritize research issues. The drastic perturbations of soil by mining activities can accentuate CO2 emission through mineralization, erosion, leaching, changes in soil moisture and temperature regimes, and reduction in biomass returned to the soil. The reclamation of drastically disturbed soils leads to improvement in soil quality and development of soil pedogenic processes accruing the benefit of SOC sequestration and additional income from trading SOC credits. The SOC sequestration potential in RMS depends on amount of biomass production and return to soil, and mechanisms of C protection. The rate of SOC sequestration ranges from 0.1 to 3.1 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) and 0.7 to 4 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) in grass and forest RMS ecosystem, respectively. Proper land restoration alone could off-set 16 Tg CO2 in the U.S. annually. However, the factors affecting C sequestration and protection in RMS leading to increase in microbial activity, nutrient availability, soil aggregation, C build up, and soil profile development must be better understood in order to formulate guidelines for development of an holistic approach to sustainable management of these ecosystems. The ECBs of RMS ecosystems are not well understood. An ecosystem method of evaluating ECB of RMS ecosystems is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16797072     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  9 in total

1.  Variations in organic carbon, aggregation, and enzyme activities of gangue-fly ash-reconstructed soils with sludge and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during 6-year reclamation.

Authors:  Ningning Yin; Zhen Zhang; Liping Wang; Kuimei Qian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Assessing metal pollution in ponds constructed for controlling runoff from reclaimed coal mines.

Authors:  Leticia Miguel-Chinchilla; Eduardo González; Francisco A Comín
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Development of population structure and spatial distribution patterns of a restored forest during 17-year succession (1993-2010) in Pingshuo opencast mine spoil, China.

Authors:  Zhongqiu Zhao; Lianhua Wang; Zhongke Bai; Ziguan Pan; Yun Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Dump stability and soil fertility of a coal mine spoil in Indian dry tropical environment: a long-term study.

Authors:  Nimisha Tripathi; Raj Shekhar Singh; Swadesh K Chaulya
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Some soil properties on coal mine spoils reclaimed with black locust (Robinia pceudoacacia L.) and umbrella pine (Pinus pinea L.) in Agacli-Istanbul.

Authors:  Tahir Keskin; Ender Makineci
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Soil organic carbon and nitrogen accumulation on coal mine spoils reclaimed with maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in Agacli-Istanbul.

Authors:  Hakan Sever; Ender Makineci
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Proteomic analysis of carbon concentrating chemolithotrophic bacteria Serratia sp. for sequestration of carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Randhir K Bharti; Shaili Srivastava; Indu Shekhar Thakur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ecological Restoration and Carbon Sequestration Regulation of Mining Areas-A Case Study of Huangshi City.

Authors:  Qipeng Liao; Xinran Liu; Mingzhu Xiao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  A Study of Phytolith-occluded Carbon Stock in Monopodial Bamboo in China.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Jiasen Wu; Peikun Jiang; Qiufang Xu; Peiping Zhao; Shanqiong He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.