Literature DB >> 16797056

Examining affinities of the Taung child by developmental simulation.

Kieran P McNulty1, Stephen R Frost, David S Strait.   

Abstract

As a well-preserved juvenile and the type specimen of Australopithecus africanus, the Taung child figures prominently in taxonomic, ontogenetic, and phylogenetic analyses of fossil hominins. Despite general agreement about allocation of Sterkfontein and Makapansgat fossils to this species, limited morphological comparisons have been possible between these adult specimens and the juvenile Taung. Here, we used developmental simulation to estimate the adult form of the Taung child, and directly compare its morphology to that of other fossil hominins. Specimens were represented by 50 three-dimensional landmarks superimposed by generalized Procrustes analysis. The simulation process applied developmental trajectories from extant hominine species to the Taung fossil in order to generate its adult form. Despite differences found in the developmental patterns of these modern species, simulations tested on extant juveniles-transforming them into "adults" using trajectories from other species-revealed that these differences have negligible impact on adult morphology. This indicates that morphology already present by occlusion of the first permanent molar is the primary determinant of adult form, thereby supporting use of extant trajectories to estimate the morphology of an extinct species. The simulated Taung adult was then compared to other adult fossils. As these comparisons required assumptions about the pattern and magnitude of developmental change, additional analyses were performed to evaluate these two parameters separately. Results of all analyses overwhelmingly rejected the possibility that the Taung child was a juvenile robust australopith, but were consistent with the hypothesis that the Taung and Sterkfontein fossils are conspecific. Between Sts 5 and Sts 71, the latter is more likely to resemble the adult form of the Taung child.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16797056     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  5 in total

Review 1.  The facial skeleton of the chimpanzee-human last common ancestor.

Authors:  Samuel N Cobb
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Early Homo, plasticity and the extended evolutionary synthesis.

Authors:  Susan C Antón; Christopher W Kuzawa
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Dental ontogeny in pliocene and early pleistocene hominins.

Authors:  Tanya M Smith; Paul Tafforeau; Adeline Le Cabec; Anne Bonnin; Alexandra Houssaye; Joane Pouech; Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi; Fredrick Manthi; Carol Ward; Masrour Makaremi; Colin G Menter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Mechanical evidence that Australopithecus sediba was limited in its ability to eat hard foods.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Keely B Carlson; Kieran P McNulty; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Kristian J Carlson; Darryl J de Ruiter; Lee R Berger; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor; Michael A Berthaume; David S Strait
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Hominoid intraspecific cranial variation mirrors neutral genetic diversity.

Authors:  Julia M Zichello; Karen L Baab; Kieran P McNulty; Christopher J Raxworthy; Michael E Steiper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.