Literature DB >> 16796518

Circumstances of bat encounters and knowledge of rabies among Minnesota residents submitting bats for rabies testing.

Alicia L Liesener1, Kirk E Smith, Rolan D Davis, Jeff B Bender, Richard N Danila, David F Neitzel, Gerda E Nordquist, Sandra R Forsman, Joni M Scheftel.   

Abstract

Minnesota residents who submitted a bat to the Minnesota Department of Health for rabies testing in 2003 were surveyed by telephone regarding the circumstances of the bat encounter and their knowledge of bats and rabies. Of 442 bats submitted for testing, 12 (3%) tested positive for rabies, and 410 (93%) tested negative; 17 (4%) bats were unsuitable for testing, and three (1%) had equivocal results. A case-control study found that rabid bats were more likely than non-rabid bats to be found in September, found outside, found in a wooded area, unable to fly, acting ill, or acting aggressively. Rabid bats were not more likely than non-rabid bats to be found during the day or to have bitten someone. While most persons submitting bats for rabies testing were aware that bats can carry rabies, few knew they should submit the bat for testing until they sought the advice of an animal control officer, veterinarian, or healthcare provider.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16796518     DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2006.6.208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis        ISSN: 1530-3667            Impact factor:   2.133


  3 in total

1.  Bat rabies and human postexposure prophylaxis, New York, USA.

Authors:  Millicent Eidson; Yoichiro Hagiwara; Robert J Rudd; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 2.  A review of the circumstances and health-seeking behaviours associated with bat exposures in high-income countries.

Authors:  Eryn Wright; Satyamurthy Anuradha; Russell Richards; Simon Reid
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.954

3.  Bat rabies in Washington State: Temporal-spatial trends and risk factors for zoonotic transmission (2000-2017).

Authors:  Jesse Bonwitt; Hanna Oltean; Misty Lang; Rochelle M Kelly; Marcia Goldoft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.