Literature DB >> 16796502

Randomized clinical trial of telepsychiatry through videoconference versus face-to-face conventional psychiatric treatment.

Carlos De Las Cuevas1, M Teresa Arredondo, M Fernanda Cabrera, Hubert Sulzenbacher, Ulrich Meise.   

Abstract

Although telepsychiatry in the form of videoconferencing has been well received in terms of increasing access to care and user satisfaction, few data on treatment outcomes and efficacy from telepsychiatry applications are available at the present time. This paper evaluates the efficacy of telepsychiatry through videoconference in the treatment of mental disorders by comparing to face-to-face conventional (F2FC) treatment. We carried out a randomized clinical trial where 140 psychiatric outpatients were randomized to either F2FC treatment or videoconference telepsychiatry (VCTP) treatment. Patients were diagnosed according to International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) criteria using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Treatment involves eight consultations lasting 30 minutes over the 24-week study period. Patients received pertinent psychotropic medication plus cognitive- behavioral therapy during sessions. The same psychiatrist diagnosed and treated all the patients that were recruited from the Community Mental Health Centre of San Sebastian de la Gomera, in the Canary Islands. Change in psychiatric test scores served as the primary efficacy criterion. Efficacy was determined by comparing baseline (visit 1) Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I) scales as well as Global Indexes (GSI, PSDI, and PST) from SCL-90R with scores obtained at the end of the study period (week 24). Response was defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2. Reliable Change Indexes were computed in SCL-90R Global Indexes scores. Of 140 patients randomized, 130 completed 24 weeks of treatment. Only 4 patients dropped out prematurely from the study in VCTP and 6 in F2FC. The study involves 534 teleconsultations, 522 F2FC consultations, and more than 500 hours of clinical practice. Significant improvements were found on the CGI and SCL-90- R Global Indexes scores of both treatment groups, showing clear clinical state improvement. No statistically significant differences were observed when the efficacy of VCTP treatment was compared to F2FC psychiatric treatment efficacy. This study demonstrated that telepsychiatry treatment through videoconference has equivalent efficacy to F2FC psychiatric treatment. Telepsychiatry showed to be an effective mean of delivering mental health services to psychiatric outpatients living in remote areas with limited resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16796502     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  39 in total

Review 1.  The role of psychosomatic medicine in global health care.

Authors:  Amy M Bauer; Pedro Bonilla; Matthew W Grover; Fremonta Meyer; Carleen Riselli; Laura White
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Use of technology for delivery of mental health and substance use services to youth living with HIV: a mixed-methods perspective.

Authors:  Parya Saberi; Carol Dawson Rose; Angie R Wootton; Kristin Ming; Dominique Legnitto; Melanie Jeske; Lance M Pollack; Mallory O Johnson; Valerie A Gruber; Torsten B Neilands
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2019-05-28

3.  Review of key telepsychiatry outcomes.

Authors:  Sam Hubley; Sarah B Lynch; Christopher Schneck; Marshall Thomas; Jay Shore
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-22

Review 4.  Remote Telepsychiatry Workforce: a Solution to Psychiatry's Workforce Issues.

Authors:  Jordan S Gardner; Brittany E Plaven; Peter Yellowlees; Jay H Shore
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Post-disaster Gulf Coast recovery using telehealth.

Authors:  Thomas J Kim; Martha I Arrieta; Sasha L Eastburn; Marjorie L Icenogle; Michelle Slagle; Azizeh H Nuriddin; Katrina M Brantley; Rachel D Foreman; Ayanna V Buckner
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.536

6.  Telemedicine: What have we learned?

Authors:  P Whitten; B Holtz; C Laplante
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Telepsychiatry: an Innovative Approach to Addressing the Opioid Crisis.

Authors:  Hossam Mahmoud; Emily Vogt
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.505

8.  Feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial of telemental health with children diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in underserved communities.

Authors:  Kathleen Myers; Ann Vander Stoep; Caitlin Lobdell
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.576

9.  Rationale and design: telepsychology service delivery for depressed elderly veterans.

Authors:  Leonard E Egede; Christopher B Frueh; Lisa K Richardson; Ronald Acierno; Patrick D Mauldin; Rebecca G Knapp; Carl Lejuez
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Telepsychiatry in the 21(st) century: transforming healthcare with technology.

Authors:  Stacie Deslich; Bruce Stec; Shane Tomblin; Alberto Coustasse
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2013-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.