OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer is a hormone-dependent tumor, which expands therapy options. The aim of this study was to perform a pharmacoeconomic assessment of these drugs in post-menopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer or on neoadjuvant therapy. METHOD: To assess the efficacy of both drug classes a meta-analysis was carried out from papers obtained in a Medline literature search (1997 - June 2004) using the following keywords: breast cancer, postmenopausal, aromatase inhibitors, antiestrogens, tamoxifen, neoadjuvant. Effectiveness parameters included: objective response, percentage with conservative surgery in neoadjuvancy; in metastatic breast cancer, time to progression. Costs were considered from drug acquisition data. To determine result strength a sensitivity analysis was undertaken, with modified costs and effectiveness. RESULTS: Results show a higher effectiveness for aromatase inhibitors as compared to antiestrogens. In neoadjuvant therapy: 56.38% versus 36% for objective response rate, and 47.64% versus 35% for conservative surgery. In metastatic cancer: 9.96 versus 6.61 months for time to progression (p <or= 0.05). The pharmacoeconomic analysis showed that selecting anastrozole represents a cost of 969 euros and 779 euros per extra effectiveness unit regarding objective response and conservative surgery, respectively, whereas in metastatic cancer patients it represents 56,525 euros per extra effectiveness unit. CONCLUSIONS: Selecting an aromatase inhibitor is a valid option in neoadjuvancy, even if such selection would represent a very high cost for metastatic cancer.
OBJECTIVE:Breast cancer is a hormone-dependent tumor, which expands therapy options. The aim of this study was to perform a pharmacoeconomic assessment of these drugs in post-menopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer or on neoadjuvant therapy. METHOD: To assess the efficacy of both drug classes a meta-analysis was carried out from papers obtained in a Medline literature search (1997 - June 2004) using the following keywords: breast cancer, postmenopausal, aromatase inhibitors, antiestrogens, tamoxifen, neoadjuvant. Effectiveness parameters included: objective response, percentage with conservative surgery in neoadjuvancy; in metastatic breast cancer, time to progression. Costs were considered from drug acquisition data. To determine result strength a sensitivity analysis was undertaken, with modified costs and effectiveness. RESULTS: Results show a higher effectiveness for aromatase inhibitors as compared to antiestrogens. In neoadjuvant therapy: 56.38% versus 36% for objective response rate, and 47.64% versus 35% for conservative surgery. In metastatic cancer: 9.96 versus 6.61 months for time to progression (p <or= 0.05). The pharmacoeconomic analysis showed that selecting anastrozole represents a cost of 969 euros and 779 euros per extra effectiveness unit regarding objective response and conservative surgery, respectively, whereas in metastatic cancerpatients it represents 56,525 euros per extra effectiveness unit. CONCLUSIONS: Selecting an aromatase inhibitor is a valid option in neoadjuvancy, even if such selection would represent a very high cost for metastatic cancer.