BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate computed tomography during arterial portography for preoperative evaluation in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODOLOGY: Computed tomography during arterial portography was performed in 11 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing hepatectomy. Segmental perfusion defect, sensitivity of the main tumor, and sensitivity of intrahepatic metastasis on computed tomography during arterial portography were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: In 9 of 11 patients (81.8%), a segmental perfusion defect was seen. The sensitivities for detecting the main tumor and intrahepatic metastasis were 81.8% and 20%, respectively. In 2 patients, the main tumors existed in segmental perfusion defects and thus were not depicted. In 4 false-negative cases, intrahepatic metastatic lesions existed in the segments that were the counterparts of segmental perfusion defects on computed tomography during arterial portography. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of computed tomography during arterial portography for diagnosing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its intrahepatic metastasis was low due to segmental perfusion defect. It is necessary for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to be subjected to systematic segmentectomy including all areas corresponding to the segmental perfusion defect.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate computed tomography during arterial portography for preoperative evaluation in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODOLOGY: Computed tomography during arterial portography was performed in 11 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomapatients undergoing hepatectomy. Segmental perfusion defect, sensitivity of the main tumor, and sensitivity of intrahepatic metastasis on computed tomography during arterial portography were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: In 9 of 11 patients (81.8%), a segmental perfusion defect was seen. The sensitivities for detecting the main tumor and intrahepatic metastasis were 81.8% and 20%, respectively. In 2 patients, the main tumors existed in segmental perfusion defects and thus were not depicted. In 4 false-negative cases, intrahepatic metastatic lesions existed in the segments that were the counterparts of segmental perfusion defects on computed tomography during arterial portography. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of computed tomography during arterial portography for diagnosing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its intrahepatic metastasis was low due to segmental perfusion defect. It is necessary for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to be subjected to systematic segmentectomy including all areas corresponding to the segmental perfusion defect.