Literature DB >> 16795858

Comparing choice and questionnaire measures of the acceptability of a staff training procedure.

D H Reid1, M B Parsons.   

Abstract

We compared questionnaire and choice measures of acceptability while evaluating effects of staff familiarity versus unfamiliarity with the system used to monitor performance during a training program. Staff members rated both monitoring formats equally favorably on the questionnaire, whereas when given a choice, they frequently chose the familiar format and never chose the unfamiliar format. These results suggest that traditional questionnaire evaluations may not be sufficiently sensitive measures of acceptability relative to choice measures.

Year:  1995        PMID: 16795858      PMCID: PMC1279795          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  1 in total

Review 1.  Social validity assessments: is current practice state of the art?

Authors:  I S Schwartz; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Visual aids and structured criteria for improving visual inspection and interpretation of single-case designs.

Authors:  Wayne W Fisher; Michael E Kelley; Joanna E Lomas
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  Evidence-based staff training: a guide for practitioners.

Authors:  Marsha B Parsons; Jeannia H Rollyson; Dennis H Reid
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2012

3.  Training residential supervisors to provide feedback for maintaining staff teaching skills with people who have severe disabilities.

Authors:  M B Parsons; D H Reid
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.