Literature DB >> 1679552

Camouflage by edge enhancement in animal coloration patterns and its implications for visual mechanisms.

D Osorio1, M V Srinivasan.   

Abstract

Animal camouflage patterns may exploit, and thus give an insight into, visual processing mechanisms. In one common type of camouflage the borders of the coloured patterns are enhanced by high contrast lines. This type of camouflage is seen on many frogs and we use it as the basis for speculating about vision in a small, frog-eating snake. It is argued that a simple categorization of intensity profiles, such as that invoked by a mechanism that detects phase-congruence, occurs at an early stage of snake vision. We show that edge-detectors using a phase-congruence strategy will be unable to distinguish between 'natural' step-edges and the enhanced border profiles commonly seen on cryptic animals, and that the camouflage will be effective over a wide range of spatial scales.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1679552     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Disruptive and cryptic coloration.

Authors:  John A Endler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Perception of visual texture and the expression of disruptive camouflage by the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  E J Kelman; R J Baddeley; A J Shohet; D Osorio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.

Authors:  Stewart Fraser; Alison Callahan; Dana Klassen; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.

Authors:  Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Computer vision, camouflage breaking and countershading.

Authors:  Ariel Tankus; Yehezkel Yeshurun
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Enhancement of chromatic contrast increases predation risk for striped butterflies.

Authors:  Nina Stobbe; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Hyperspectral imaging of cuttlefish camouflage indicates good color match in the eyes of fish predators.

Authors:  Chuan-Chin Chiao; J Kenneth Wickiser; Justine J Allen; Brock Genter; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Cuttlefish use visual cues to control three-dimensional skin papillae for camouflage.

Authors:  Justine J Allen; Lydia M Mäthger; Alexandra Barbosa; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Perception of edges and visual texture in the camouflage of the common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  S Zylinski; D Osorio; A J Shohet
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.