Literature DB >> 16793973

Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement--in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen.

Andrew Slater1, Stuart A Taylor, David Burling, Louise Gartner, Julia Scarth, Steve Halligan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on polyp conspicuity and measurement with porcine colonic specimen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven (3-10-mm-diameter) polyps were created in porcine colon and the specimen submerged in saline. Four-detector row CT was performed after gas distension and after filling with six barium sulfate suspensions (attenuation, 100-1000 HU). Two readers independently measured maximal two-dimensional polyp diameter on each data set with the following four viewing windows and window levels and window widths, respectively: colon (-150 HU, 1500 HU), lung (-500 HU, 1500 HU), bone (500 HU, 2500 HU), and abdomen (40 HU, 400 HU). In consensus, polyp conspicuity (compared with air data set) was assigned a grade of 1-4 for each viewing window (grade 1, not seen or barely visible; grade 4, optimally seen). For statistical analysis, conspicuity grades were collapsed to a two-point scale. Data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi2 tests.
RESULTS: Accuracy of polyp measurement was independent of viewing window for attenuation of tagged fluid of 100-300 HU but differed significantly for 500-1000 HU (P < .001); that for colonic and bone viewing windows was superior (median size difference, 1.0 mm; interquartile range, 0.5-1.5). Conspicuity differed significantly according to viewing window at all attenuation values (P < .001). For 100-300 HU with abdominal viewing window, 83% (24 of 29) of observations were assigned grade 3 or 4 (best). For 500-1000 HU with bone viewing window, 94% (30 of 32) of observations were assigned grade 3 or 4 (superior). Overall conspicuity was best with bone viewing windows at 700 HU.
CONCLUSION: Polyp conspicuity and measurement in tagged data sets were optimized at 700 HU with bone viewing windows. At less than 300 HU, conspicuity improved with abdominal viewing windows. RSNA, 2006

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16793973     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2401050984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Intra-individual comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for bowel preparation at CT colonography: automated volumetric analysis of residual fluid for quality assessment.

Authors:  P Bannas; J Bakke; A Munoz del Rio; P J Pickhardt
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Automated volumetric analysis for comparison of oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) with established cathartic agents at CT colonography.

Authors:  Peter Bannas; Joshua Bakke; James L Patrick; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-01

4.  Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography.

Authors:  Delia Campanella; Lia Morra; Silvia Delsanto; Vincenzo Tartaglia; Roberto Asnaghi; Alberto Bert; Emanuele Neri; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Ultrasound virtual endoscopy: Polyp detection and reliability of measurement in an in vitro study with pig intestine specimens.

Authors:  Jin-Ya Liu; Li-Da Chen; Hua-Song Cai; Jin-Yu Liang; Ming Xu; Yang Huang; Wei Li; Shi-Ting Feng; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Wei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination.

Authors:  Jake Theis; David H Kim; Meghan G Lubner; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-01

7.  CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Andrew Slater; David N Burling; Emily Tam; Rebecca Greenhalgh; Louise Gartner; Julia Scarth; Robert Pearce; Paul Bassett; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings.

Authors:  Christian Bräuer; Philippe Lefere; Stefaan Gryspeerdt; Helmut Ringl; Ali Al-Mukhtar; Paul Apfaltrer; Dominik Berzaczy; Barbara Füger; Julia Furtner; Christina Müller-Mang; Matthias Pones; Martina Scharitzer; Ramona Woitek; Anno Graser; Michael Weber; Thomas Mang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  A quantitative validation of segmented colon in virtual colonoscopy using image moments.

Authors:  K N Manjunath; G K Prabhu; P C Siddalingaswamy
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.910

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.