Literature DB >> 1679385

Effects of alterations in left ventricular filling, contractility, and systemic vascular resistance on the ascending aortic blood velocity waveform of normal subjects.

M Singer1, M J Allen, A R Webb, E D Bennett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To confirm the consistent effects on Doppler-measured aortic blood flow velocity waveform variables of alterations in left ventricular preload, afterload, and inotropy using pharmacologic and physiologic maneuvers.
SETTING: Medical school laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Healthy volunteers.
INTERVENTIONS: Increasing infusion rates of dobutamine (1.25 to 5 micrograms/kg.min), esmolol (1.25 to 5 mg/min), phentolamine (1.25 to 5 mg/min), methoxamine (1.25 to 5 mg/min), metaraminol (1.25 to 5 mg/min), and placebo (1.25 to 5 mL of 0.9% saline/min) and increasing plasma removal (0.5 to 1 L) in awake, rested, supine subjects.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ascending aortic blood flow was measured by the suprasternal Doppler approach allowing calculation of waveform variables of stroke distance and minute distance (linear measures of stroke volume and cardiac output), peak velocity, mean acceleration and flow time corrected for heart rate. An index of systemic vascular resistance was obtained by dividing mean systemic BP by the minute distance. Inotropic changes predominantly affected peak velocity and mean acceleration. Changes in preload mainly affected the flow time corrected for heart rate, whereas afterload changes had an intermediate effect. Unsuspected but subsequently confirmed hemodynamic effects were seen with esmolol and metaraminol.
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic blood flow velocity waveform variables measured by Doppler ultrasound can be used to noninvasively follow changes in left ventricular preload, afterload, and inotropy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1679385     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199109000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  22 in total

1.  Systolic duration, preload, and afterload: Is a new paradigm needed?

Authors:  Denis Chemla; Alain Nitenberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The FTc is not an accurate marker of left ventricular preload.

Authors:  Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data].

Authors:  U Wittkowski; C Spies; M Sander; J Erb; A Feldheiser; C von Heymann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Cardiac output in 1998.

Authors:  M Singer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Change in stroke volume in response to fluid challenge: assessment using esophageal Doppler.

Authors:  Margareta Roeck; Stephan M Jakob; Thomas Boehlen; Lukas Brander; Rafael Knuesel; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Intensive care.

Authors:  S Sinclair; M Singer
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  A new modality for the estimation of corrected flow time via electrocardiography as an alternative to Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  Hooman Hossein-Nejad; Payam Mohammadinejad; Atefeh Zeinoddini; Seyedhossein Seyedhosseini Davarani; Mohsen Banaie
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Limits of corrected flow time to monitor hemodynamic status in children.

Authors:  E Wodey; F Carre; X Beneux; A Schaffuser; C Ecoffey
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Moira McKendry; Helen McGloin; Debbie Saberi; Libby Caudwell; Anthony R Brady; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-08

Review 10.  Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy in high risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Nicholas Lees; Mark Hamilton; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.