Literature DB >> 16792745

Melanoma risk in congenital melanocytic naevi: a systematic review.

S Krengel1, A Hauschild, T Schäfer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of malignant melanoma in congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) is a matter of controversial and ongoing debate.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a careful and detailed summary of the published data, including several recently published studies.
METHODS: Articles on CMN (n=1424) were retrieved from Medline, 1966-October 2005. Case reports and studies lacking relevant clinical information were excluded. Only systematic collections of cases were taken into consideration. Series with fewer than 20 patients or studies with a mean follow-up of <3 years were regarded as epidemiologically less significant.
RESULTS: Fourteen articles were finally chosen for further analysis. The studies varied significantly with respect to study design (source of cases; retrospective vs. prospective analysis), age of patients, follow-up time, and naevus characteristics. The frequency of melanomas ranged between 0.05% and 10.7% and was significantly higher in smaller studies (P<0.0001). In a total of 6571 patients with CMN who were followed for a mean of 3.4-23.7 years, 46 patients (0.7%) developed 49 melanomas. The mean age at diagnosis of melanoma was 15.5 years (median 7). By comparison with age-adjusted data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, we calculated that patients with CMN carry an approximately 465-fold increased relative risk of developing melanoma during childhood and adolescence. Primary melanomas arose inside the naevi in 33 of 49 cases (67%). In seven cases (14%), metastatic melanoma with unknown primary was encountered; in four cases (8%) the melanoma developed at an extracutaneous site. The risk of developing melanoma and the rate of fatal courses were by far highest in CMN>or=40 cm in diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of melanoma of 0.7% in all 14 studies was lower than expected. The higher incidence of melanomas in smaller studies indicates selection bias. The melanoma risk strongly depends on the size of CMN and is highest in those naevi traditionally designated as garment naevi. The median age of 7 years at diagnosis of melanoma points to a risk maximum in childhood and adolescence. Future studies on CMN should report: (i) diameter, percentage of body surface, and localization of the CMN; (ii) percentage of naevus area removed by excision or subject to dermabrasion or other superficial treatments; (iii) mean and median age at entry into the study; (iv) mean and median follow-up time; (v) details on each melanoma case; (vi) standardized morbidity ratio of melanoma; and (vii) percentage of neurocutaneous melanosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16792745     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07218.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  67 in total

Review 1.  [New aspects of congenital melanocytic nevi].

Authors:  S Krengel
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Multiple oncogenic mutations and clonal relationship in spatially distinct benign human epidermal tumors.

Authors:  Christian Hafner; Agustí Toll; Alejandro Fernández-Casado; Julie Earl; Miriam Marqués; Francesco Acquadro; Marinela Méndez-Pertuz; Miguel Urioste; Núria Malats; Julie E Burns; Margaret A Knowles; Juan C Cigudosa; Arndt Hartmann; Thomas Vogt; Michael Landthaler; Ramón M Pujol; Francisco X Real
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Naevus-associated lentigo maligna: coincidence or continuum?

Authors:  A Lallas; I Zalaudek; C Cota; E Moscarella; D Tiodorovic-Zivkovic; C Catricalà; G Argenziano
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 4.  A giant congenital melanocytic nevus associated with neurocutaneous melanosis.

Authors:  S J Kim; J-H Kim; B Son; C Yoo
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  NRAS mutation is the sole recurrent somatic mutation in large congenital melanocytic nevi.

Authors:  Christelle Charbel; Romain H Fontaine; Gabriel G Malouf; Arnaud Picard; Natacha Kadlub; Nizar El-Murr; Alexandre How-Kit; Xiaoping Su; Aurore Coulomb-L'Hermine; Jorg Tost; Samia Mourah; Selim Aractingi; Sarah Guégan
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Giant congenital melanocytic nevi and malignant transformation: a case for early radical intervention.

Authors:  Christopher R Maguire; Ryan Livingston; Gael E Phillips; Roy M Kimble
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  A change in birth mark.

Authors:  Hadi Mirfazaelian; Ahmad Mosalei; Yahya Daneshbod
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 8.  Rare presentations of primary melanoma and special populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa A Kottschade; Travis E Grotz; Roxana S Dronca; Diva R Salomao; Jose S Pulido; Nabil Wasif; James W Jakub; Sanjay P Bagaria; Riten Kumar; Judith S Kaur; Shane Y Morita; Steven L Moran; Jesse T Nguyen; Emily C Nguyen; Jennifer L Hand; Lori A Erickson; Jerry D Brewer; Christian L Baum; Robert C Miller; David L Swanson; Val Lowe; Svetomir N Markovic
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 9.  Conceptual approach to early melanoma detection: models, tools, issues and challenges.

Authors:  Shadi Damanpour; James M Grichnik
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-11-24

Review 10.  Using dermoscopic criteria and patient-related factors for the management of pigmented melanocytic nevi.

Authors:  Iris Zalaudek; Giovanni Docimo; Giuseppe Argenziano
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.