Literature DB >> 16792343

Using cavity liners with direct posterior composite restorations.

Jose-Luis Ruiz1, Sumita Mitra.   

Abstract

Cavity liners have traditionally been used in direct and indirect restorations for purposes such as promoting reparative dentin and neutralizing acids. Today, liners are used when resin composites are used as the restorative materials on the posterior teeth, but for a different reason. Clinically, liners are considered to decrease sensitivity and wet the cavity better than restorative composites because of their flowability, adaptation to the dentinal surface, and adhesion. As bonding systems and composite materials continue to improve and become better understood, so do the techniques for placing composites. This has led to the reassessment of the clinical relevance and function of liners. Some clinicians don't use cavity liners, assuming they are a thing of the past; some use composite liners, and others use resin-modified glass ionomer liners. Additionally, there is not a clear agreement over the function of liners, such as when and why they should be used or what type of liner material would provide the best performance for a particular clinical situation. This article attempts to clarify some of the confusion surrounding the use of liners by reviewing the available literature on the subject and attempting to give evidence-based rationale for the use and protocol for the clinician.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16792343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent        ISSN: 1548-8578


  6 in total

1.  Restoration variables and postoperative hypersensitivity in Class I restorations: PEARL Network findings. Part 2.

Authors:  Peter Blanchard; Ying Wong; Abigail G Matthews; Donald Vena; Ronald G Craig; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2013-04

2.  Effect of acid pre-conditioning and/or delayed light irradiation on enamel bond strength of three resin-modified glass ionomers.

Authors:  Maryam Khoroushi; Moeen Hosseini-Shirazi; Hojatolah Soleimani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-05

3.  Evaluation of microleakage in posterior nanocomposite restorations with adhesive liners.

Authors:  B Simi; Bs Suprabha
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-04

4.  Microleakage and Micrographic Evaluation of Composite Restorations with Various Bases over ZOE Layer in Pulpotomized Primary Molars.

Authors:  M Bargrizan; M Mirkarimi; M Rezamand; S Eskandarion
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2011-12-20

5.  Evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: Bonded-base and bulk-fill techniques.

Authors:  Atiyeh Feiz; Marzieh Sajedi; Niloufar Jafari; Edward J Swift
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-10-21

6.  Comparative evaluation of the bond strength of posterior composite with different cavity configurations and different liners using a two-step etch and rinse adhesive system: In vitro study.

Authors:  Tanaya Kumar; Anita Sanap; Karan Bhargava; Shalini Aggarwal; Gurupriya Kaur; Kunal Kunjir
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.