| Literature DB >> 16792289 |
N Jeremy Hill1, Thomas Navin Lal, Michael Schröder, Thilo Hinterberger, Barbara Wilhelm, Femke Nijboer, Ursula Mochty, Guido Widman, Christian Elger, Bernhard Schölkopf, Andrea Kübler, Niels Birbaumer.
Abstract
We summarize results from a series of related studies that aim to develop a motor-imagery-based brain-computer interface using a single recording session of electroencephalogram (EEG) or electrocorticogram (ECoG) signals for each subject. We apply the same experimental and analytical methods to 11 nonparalysed subjects (eight EEG, three ECoG), and to five paralyzed subjects (four EEG, one ECoG) who had been unable to communicate for some time. While it was relatively easy to obtain classifiable signals quickly from most of the nonparalyzed subjects, it proved impossible to classify the signals obtained from the paralyzed patients by the same methods. This highlights the fact that though certain BCI paradigms may work well with healthy subjects, this does not necessarily indicate success with the target user group. We outline possible reasons for this failure to transfer.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16792289 DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng ISSN: 1534-4320 Impact factor: 3.802