Literature DB >> 16791581

Testing equivalence between two laboratories or two methods using paired-sample analysis and interval hypothesis testing.

Shixia Feng1, Qiwei Liang, Robin D Kinser, Kirk Newland, Rudolf Guilbaud.   

Abstract

A modified interval hypothesis testing procedure based on paired-sample analysis is described, as well as its application in testing equivalence between two bioanalytical laboratories or two methods. This testing procedure has the advantage of reducing the risk of wrongly concluding equivalence when in fact two laboratories or two methods are not equivalent. The advantage of using paired-sample analysis is that the test is less confounded by the intersample variability than unpaired-sample analysis when incurred biological samples with a wide range of concentrations are included in the experiments. Practical aspects including experimental design, sample size calculation and power estimation are also discussed through examples.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16791581     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-006-0417-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  3 in total

1.  Cine computed tomography without respiratory surrogate in planning stereotactic radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Adam C Riegel; Joe Y Chang; Sastry S Vedam; Valen Johnson; Pai-Chun Melinda Chi; Tinsu Pan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  The logic of equivalence testing and its use in laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Cristiano Ialongo
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

3.  Evaluating revised biomass equations: are some forest types more equivalent than others?

Authors:  Coeli M Hoover; James E Smith
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2016-01-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.