Literature DB >> 16791073

Dynamic lower extremity alignment in children with achondroplasia.

Muharrem Inan1, Mihir Thacker, Chris Church, Freeman Miller, William G Mackenzie, Dolores Conklin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze lower extremity dynamic malalignment during gait using a 3-dimensional kinematics and kinetics in 13 children (3-17 years old) with achondroplasia and to compare measurements of alignment and malrotation between gait, radiographic, and clinical measures. Gait analysis in the coronal plane showed a varus malalignment of the knee (19 +/- 13 degrees) and variable tibial torsion abnormalities (13 [internal] +/- 15.7 degrees). Radiographs also showed knee varus malalignment (16 +/- 9 degrees); however, there was poor correlation with gait analysis measures (P > 0.05). In the sagittal plane, radiographs showed genu recurvatum deformity (23.5 +/- 13.2 degrees), although the sagittal plane knee kinematics were normal. Kinetic analyses of the knee showed high internal knee valgus moments (external varus moments, 0.48 +/- 0.25 N m/kg), which were significantly different from the normal population (P < 0.05). In conclusion, there is a 3-dimensional, complex, dynamic deformity of the lower extremity present in children with achondroplasia. We recommend a very careful assessment of the limb focusing on both the static and dynamic varus deformity and tibial torsion using a combination of radiographic, clinical, and gait analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16791073     DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000217712.42115.e6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  7 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance evaluation of the knee in children and adolescents with achondroplasia.

Authors:  Yakup Akyol; Lauren W Averill; Alfred Atanda; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Michael B Bober; William G Mackenzie
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-11-29

Review 2.  Disease-specific complications and multidisciplinary interventions in achondroplasia.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kitoh; Masaki Matsushita; Kenichi Mishima; Yasunari Kamiya; Kenta Sawamura
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Achondroplasia: a comprehensive clinical review.

Authors:  Richard M Pauli
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  How reliable are standard radiographic measures of the foot and ankle in children with achondroplasia?

Authors:  Jia Xu; Kwang-Won Park; Qing-Lin Kang; Young-Jin Jung; Hae-Ryong Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Arthroscopic knee anatomy in young achondroplasia patients.

Authors:  M Del Pilar Duque Orozco; N C Record; K J Rogers; M B Bober; W G Mackenzie; A Atanda
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Gait in children with achondroplasia - a cross-sectional study on joint kinematics and kinetics.

Authors:  Eva W Broström; Lotte Antonissen; Johan von Heideken; Anna-Clara Esbjörnsson; Lars Hagenäs; Josefine E Naili
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Achondroplasia Natural History Study (CLARITY): a multicenter retrospective cohort study of achondroplasia in the United States.

Authors:  Julie E Hoover-Fong; Adekemi Y Alade; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Jacqueline T Hecht; Janet M Legare; Mary Ellen Little; Chengxin Liu; John McGready; Peggy Modaff; Richard M Pauli; David F Rodriguez-Buritica; Kerry J Schulze; Maria Elena Serna; Cory J Smid; Michael B Bober
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 8.822

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.