Literature DB >> 16791065

Biomechanical analysis of single screw fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: are more threads across the physis necessary for stability?

Vidyadhar Upasani1, Shyam Kishan, Richard Oka, Andrew Mahar, Michael Rohmiller, Maya Pring, Dennis Wenger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate single screw fixation stability, in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, as a function of screw thread distribution across the physis. STUDY
DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study.
METHODS: Thirty porcine proximal femurs were sectioned through the physeal line and stabilized with a cannulated 7.3-mm stainless steel AO screw. The distal 16 mm of each screw was threaded (5 threads). The femurs were randomized into 5 groups (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 threads across the physis) and biomechanically tested to determine failure load (N) and stiffness (N/mm).
RESULTS: Femurs with 2 or 3 threads across the physis had a significantly greater load to failure and stiffness compared with femurs with 1, 4, or 5 threads across the physis (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Thread distribution across the physis seems to be important. When using screws with a 16-mm thread, greatest strength and stiffness are achieved when 40%-60% of threads engage the epiphysis, with a significant decrease when greater than 80% of threads cross the physis. Too few threads in the epiphysis as well as too few in the metaphysis both lead to decreased stability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study challenges the belief that compression across the physis maximizes slipped capital femoral epiphysis fixation stability. We recommend equal distribution of threads across the physis when using 16-mm thread screws, and we postulate that screws with a greater thread length (32 mm or fully threaded) would increase fixation stability even further. Optimizing purchase may decrease the incidence of slip progression, especially as the prevalence of obesity increases in the adolescent population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16791065     DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000217732.24041.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  10 in total

1.  Management of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: The Hawai'i Experience.

Authors:  John P Livingstone; Mariya I Opanova; Robert C Durkin; William Burkhalter
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2019-11

2.  Is there a persistent capital femoral epiphysis growth after screw fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

Authors:  Camille Sleth; François Bauzou; Claudia De Cristo; Fanny Alkar; Pauline Joly-Monrigal; Clément Jeandel; Jérôme Cottalorda; Djamel Louahem M'Sabah; Marion Delpont
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-04-09

3.  The Universal Entry Point with oblique screw is superior to fixation perpendicular to the physis in moderate slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Jillian Lee; Jonathon A Lillia; Jeremy M Bellemore; David G Little; Tegan L Cheng
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Percutaneous Epiphysiodesis Using Transphyseal Screws: a Case Series Demonstrating High Efficacy.

Authors:  Emily R Dodwell; Matthew R Garner; Elise Bixby; Eva M Luderowski; Daniel W Green; John S Blanco; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-04-03

5.  Cyclical loading causes injury in and around the porcine proximal femoral physeal plate: proposed cause of the development of cam deformity in young athletes.

Authors:  Páll Sigurgeir Jónasson; Lars Ekström; Hans-Arne Hansson; Mikael Sansone; Jón Karlsson; Leif Swärd; Adad Baranto
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2015-03-08

6.  Strength of the porcine proximal femoral epiphyseal plate: the effect of different loading directions and the role of the perichondrial fibrocartilaginous complex and epiphyseal tubercle - an experimental biomechanical study.

Authors:  Páll Sigurgeir Jónasson; Lars Ekström; Anna Swärd; Mikael Sansone; Mattias Ahldén; Jón Karlsson; Adad Baranto
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2014-06-26

7.  Lateral insertion is a good prognostic factor after in situ fixation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Shigeo Hagiwara; Junichi Nakamura; Makoto Kamegaya; Takashi Saisu; Jun Kakizaki; Seiji Ohtori; Shunji Kishida; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation.

Authors:  E Leblanc; J M Bellemore; T Cheng; D G Little; O Birke
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 9.  A systematic review of undisplaced femoral neck fracture treatments for patients over 65 years of age, with a focus on union rates and avascular necrosis.

Authors:  Dan-Feng Xu; Fang-Gang Bi; Chi-Yuan Ma; Zheng-Fa Wen; Xun-Zi Cai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Fluoroscopic imaging overestimates the screw tip to subchondral bone distance in a cadaveric model of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  M J Heffernan; B Snyder; H Zhou; X Li
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.548

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.