Literature DB >> 16790698

Cyclophosphamide versus placebo in scleroderma lung disease.

Donald P Tashkin1, Robert Elashoff, Philip J Clements, Jonathan Goldin, Michael D Roth, Daniel E Furst, Edgar Arriola, Richard Silver, Charlie Strange, Marcy Bolster, James R Seibold, David J Riley, Vivien M Hsu, John Varga, Dean E Schraufnagel, Arthur Theodore, Robert Simms, Robert Wise, Fredrick Wigley, Barbara White, Virginia Steen, Charles Read, Maureen Mayes, Ed Parsley, Kamal Mubarak, M Kari Connolly, Jeffrey Golden, Mitchell Olman, Barri Fessler, Naomi Rothfield, Mark Metersky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effects of oral cyclophosphamide on lung function and health-related symptoms in patients with evidence of active alveolitis and scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease.
METHODS: At 13 clinical centers throughout the United States, we enrolled 158 patients with scleroderma, restrictive lung physiology, dyspnea, and evidence of inflammatory interstitial lung disease on examination of bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid, thoracic high-resolution computed tomography, or both. Patients received oral cyclophosphamide (< or =2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or matching placebo for one year and were followed for an additional year. Pulmonary function was assessed every three months during the first year, and the primary end point was the forced vital capacity (FVC, expressed as a percentage of the predicted value) at 12 months, after adjustment for the baseline FVC.
RESULTS: Of 158 patients, 145 completed at least six months of treatment and were included in the analysis. The mean absolute difference in adjusted 12-month FVC percent predicted between the cyclophosphamide and placebo groups was 2.53 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.28 to 4.79 percent), favoring cyclophosphamide (P<0.03). There were also treatment-related differences in physiological and symptom outcomes, and the difference in FVC was maintained at 24 months. There was a greater frequency of adverse events in the cyclophosphamide group, but the difference between the two groups in the number of serious adverse events was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: One year of oral cyclophosphamide in patients with symptomatic scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease had a significant but modest beneficial effect on lung function, dyspnea, thickening of the skin, and the health-related quality of life. The effects on lung function were maintained through the 24 months of the study. Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16790698     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa055120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  427 in total

1.  Mycophenolate mofetil in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Athanasios Koutroumpas; Athanasios Ziogas; Ioannis Alexiou; Georgia Barouta; Lazaros I Sakkas
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Evidence-based management of rapidly progressing systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Christopher P Denton
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Cyclophosphamide responsive interstitial lung disease in "overlap syndrome": a clinical pathology conference held by the division of rheumatology at the hospital for special surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth Schulman; Kun Chen; Gregory Saboeiro; Abraham Sanders; Kyriakos Kirou; Robert F Spiera; Anne R Bass; Doruk Erkan
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-10-26

4.  Patterns and predictors of change in outcome measures in clinical trials in scleroderma: an individual patient meta-analysis of 629 subjects with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  P A Merkel; N P Silliman; P J Clements; C P Denton; D E Furst; M D Mayes; J E Pope; R P Polisson; J B Streisand; J R Seibold
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-10

5.  Cyclophosphamide: a novel treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia associated with systemic sclerosis?

Authors:  Alicia Peterson; John Varga
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 6.  Lung involvement in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Paul M Hassoun
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 1.228

7.  Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Daniel E Furst; Philip J Clements; Yannick Allanore; Murray Baron; Lazlo Czirjak; Oliver Distler; Ivan Foeldvari; Masataka Kuwana; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Maureen Mayes; Thomas Medsger; Peter A Merkel; Janet E Pope; James R Seibold; Virginia Steen; Wendy Stevens; Christopher P Denton
Journal:  J Scleroderma Relat Disord       Date:  2017 Jan-Apr

8.  Effects of 1-year treatment with cyclophosphamide on outcomes at 2 years in scleroderma lung disease.

Authors:  Donald P Tashkin; Robert Elashoff; Philip J Clements; Michael D Roth; Daniel E Furst; Richard M Silver; Jonathan Goldin; Edgar Arriola; Charlie Strange; Marcy B Bolster; James R Seibold; David J Riley; Vivien M Hsu; John Varga; Dean Schraufnagel; Arthur Theodore; Robert Simms; Robert Wise; Fred Wigley; Barbara White; Virginia Steen; Charles Read; Maureen Mayes; Ed Parsley; Kamal Mubarak; M Kari Connolly; Jeffrey Golden; Mitchell Olman; Barri Fessler; Naomi Rothfield; Mark Metersky; Dinesh Khanna; Ning Li; Gang Li
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 9.  Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Predrag Ostojic; Marco Matucci Cerinic; Richard Silver; Kristin Highland; Nemanja Damjanov
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 10.  Current concepts in disease-modifying therapy for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: lessons from clinical trials.

Authors:  Karen Au; Dinesh Khanna; Philip J Clements; Daniel E Furst; Donald P Tashkin
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.