Literature DB >> 16788908

Systematic QM/MM investigation of factors that affect the cytochrome P450-catalyzed hydrogen abstraction of camphor.

Ahmet Altun1, Sason Shaik, Walter Thiel.   

Abstract

The hydrogen abstraction reaction of camphor in cytochrome P450(cam) has been investigated in the native enzyme environment by combined quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) calculations and in the gas phase by density functional calculations. This work has been motivated by contradictory published QM/MM results. In an attempt to pinpoint the origin of these discrepancies, we have systematically studied the factors that may affect the computed barriers, including the QM/MM setup, the optimization procedures, and the choice of QM region, basis set, and protonation states. It is found that the ChemShell and QSite programs used in the published QM/MM calculations yield similar results at given geometries, and that the discrepancies mainly arise from two technical issues (optimization protocols and initial system preparation) that need to be well controlled in QM/MM work. In the course of these systematic investigations, new mechanistic insights have been gained. The crystallographic water 903 placed near the oxo atom of Compound I lowers the hydrogen abstraction barrier by ca. 4 kcal/mol, and thus acts as a catalyst for this reaction. Spin density may appear at the A-propionate side chain of the heme if the carboxylate group is not properly screened, which might be expected to happen during protein dynamics, but not in static equilibrium situations. There is no clear correlation between the computed A-propionate spin density and the hydrogen abstraction barrier, and hence, no support for a previously proposed side-chain mediated transition state stabilization mechanism. Standard QM/MM optimizations yield an A-propionate environment close to the X-ray structure only for protonated Asp297, and not for deprotonated Asp297, but the computed barriers are similar in both cases. An X-ray like A-propionate environment can also be obtained when deprotonated Asp297 is included in the QM region and His355 is singly protonated, but this Compound II-type species with a closed-shell porphyrin ring has a higher hydrogen abstraction barrier and should thus not be mechanistically relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16788908     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  9 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide to modelling enzyme-catalysed reactions.

Authors:  Richard Lonsdale; Jeremy N Harvey; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 2.  Recent developments of the quantum chemical cluster approach for modeling enzyme reactions.

Authors:  Per E M Siegbahn; Fahmi Himo
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 3.  Protein effects in non-heme iron enzyme catalysis: insights from multiscale models.

Authors:  Nathalie Proos Vedin; Marcus Lundberg
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.358

4.  How accurate is the description of ligand-protein interactions by a hybrid QM/MM approach?

Authors:  Jakub Kollar; Vladimir Frecer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  An investigation of the catalytic mechanism of S-adenosylmethionine synthetase by QM/MM calculations.

Authors:  George D Markham; Fusao Takusagawa; Anthony M Dijulio; Charles W Bock
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.013

6.  How Do Perfluorinated Alkanoic Acids Elicit Cytochrome P450 to Catalyze Methane Hydroxylation? An MD and QM/MM Study.

Authors:  Chunsen Li; Sason Shaik
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.361

7.  QM/MM Simulation on P450 BM3 Enzyme Catalysis Mechanism.

Authors:  Li Tian; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Does compound I vary significantly between isoforms of cytochrome P450?

Authors:  Richard Lonsdale; Julianna Oláh; Adrian J Mulholland; Jeremy N Harvey
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Multiscale Simulations on the Catalytic Plasticity of CYP76AH1.

Authors:  Yufan Qiu; Hongjuan Diao; Ying Zheng; Ruibo Wu
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.221

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.