Literature DB >> 16788311

Comparison of a new automated von Willebrand factor activity assay with an aggregation von Willebrand ristocetin cofactor activity assay for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

An De Vleeschauwer1, Katrien Devreese.   

Abstract

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by quantitative and/or qualitative defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF). The HemosIL von Willebrand Factor Activity assay, a new automated immunological test to measure VWF activity, was implemented on STAC and compared with the von Willebrand ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) aggregation method. Imprecision and dilution studies were also performed. Within-run imprecision was 17.2% and between-run imprecision was 8.3% (coefficients of variation). Dilution studies showed a linearity between 12.5 and 100%. Passing and Bablok regression comparing the HemosIL von Willebrand Factor Activity assay and the aggregation method yielded a slope of 1.25 (95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.38) and intercept of -1.40 (95% confidence interval: -8.07 to 0.00). The correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.89). With a cut-off value of 50% for VWF activity, the assay has a sensitivity of 94.1% and a specificity of 92.8%, compared with the VWF:RCo aggregation assay with a cut-off value of 60% producing a sensitivity of 100.0% (specificity 87.6%). With a cut-off value of 60%, the HemosIL von Willebrand Factor Activity assay on STAC is a reliable assay for VWD. VWF:RCo or other functional testing is still required to confirm the diagnosis and for further classification of VWD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16788311     DOI: 10.1097/01.mbc.0000233365.10981.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis        ISSN: 0957-5235            Impact factor:   1.276


  6 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory testing for von Willebrand disease: toward a mechanism-based classification.

Authors:  Richard Torres; Yuri Fedoriw
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 2.  Platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor activity. Nomenclature and methodology: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Authors:  I Bodó; J Eikenboom; R Montgomery; J Patzke; R Schneppenheim; J Di Paola
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  Comparison of von Willebrand factor platelet-binding activity assays: ELISA overreads type 2B with loss of HMW multimers.

Authors:  Attila Szederjesi; Luciano Baronciani; Ulrich Budde; Giancarlo Castaman; Paola Colpani; Andrew S Lawrie; Yuan Liu; Robert Montgomery; Flora Peyvandi; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Jürgen Patzke; Imre Bodó
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  An international collaborative study to compare different von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib binding activity assays: the COMPASS-VWF study.

Authors:  A Szederjesi; L Baronciani; U Budde; G Castaman; A S Lawrie; Y Liu; R Montgomery; F Peyvandi; R Schneppenheim; A Várkonyi; J Patzke; I Bodó
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.824

5.  A Comparative Evaluation of an Automated Functional Assay for Von Willebrand Factor Activity in Type 1 Von Willebrand Disease.

Authors:  Shiue-Wei Lai; Chia-Yau Chang; Shin-Nan Cheng; Shu-Hsia Hu; Chung-Yu Lai; Yeu-Chin Chen
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-09-02

6.  Differences in von Willebrand factor function in type 2A von Willebrand disease and left ventricular assist device-induced acquired von Willebrand syndrome.

Authors:  Shannen Deconinck; Claudia Tersteeg; Els Bailleul; Leen Delrue; Nele Vandeputte; Inge Pareyn; Nathalie Itzhar-Baikian; Hans Deckmyn; Simon F De Meyer; Marc Vanderheyden; Karen Vanhoorelbeke
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-10-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.