Literature DB >> 16787848

Leg health and performance of broiler chickens reared in different light environments.

H H Kristensen1, G C Perry, N B Prescott, J Ladewig, A K Ersbøll, C M Wathes.   

Abstract

1. The effects of light source and intensity on leg health and performance of female ROSS 308 broiler chickens were investigated in a 2 x 2 experimental design (8 groups of 275 chicks) of two light sources (Osram biolux and Osram warm-white) and two light intensities (5 and 100 clux, adjusted to fowl-perceived illuminance). 2. At 41 d of age, body weight, gait-score, footpad dermatitis and hock-burn were measured on 50 birds from each light environment. In addition, weekly feed intake and body weight were determined on a group basis and mortality was recorded continuously. 3. The light environment did not affect the severity of the gait-score or hock-burns. The risk of moderate to severe lameness and hock-burns increased with body weight. Birds weighing more than 2400 g had an increased probability of moderate footpad lesions in biolux light. 4. Weight and gait-score, as well as gait-score and hock-burn were positively correlated. Podo-dermatitis was weakly correlated with hock-burn, which contradicts earlier findings. The light environment did not affect feed intake, body weight or mortality. 5. The light sources and intensities employed in this study did not adversely affect production or leg health of broiler chickens reared semi-commercially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16787848     DOI: 10.1080/00071660600753557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  6 in total

1.  Artificial light and biological responses of broiler chickens: dose-response.

Authors:  Yefeng Yang; Chenghao Pan; Renhai Zhong; Jinming Pan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The effect of supplementary ultraviolet wavelengths on broiler chicken welfare indicators.

Authors:  Charlotte James; Lucy Asher; Katherine Herborn; Julian Wiseman
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.448

3.  Animal-based welfare indicators of 4 slow-growing broiler genotypes for the approval in an animal welfare label program.

Authors:  Helen Louton; Christiane Keppler; Michael Erhard; Otto van Tuijl; Josef Bachmeier; Klaus Damme; Sven Reese; Elke Rauch
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Light Color and the Commercial Broiler: Effect on Ocular Health and Visual Acuity.

Authors:  Bruna Remonato Franco; Marina L Leis; Melody Wong; Tory Shynkaruk; Trever Crowe; Bryan Fancher; Nick French; Scot Gillingham; Karen Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Effects of environmental complexity on welfare indicators of fast-growing broiler chickens.

Authors:  Fernanda M Tahamtani; Ida Just Pedersen; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  From the Point of View of the Chickens: What Difference Does a Window Make?

Authors:  Elaine Cristina de Oliveira Sans; Frank André Maurice Tuyttens; Cesar Augusto Taconeli; Ana Silvia Pedrazzani; Marcos Martinez Vale; Carla Forte Maiolino Molento
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.