E Kurca1, S Sivák, P Kucera. 1. Clinic of Neurology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin, Slovak Republic. kurca@mfn.sk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is a common neurological (neurotraumatological) diagnosis. As well as different subjective symptoms, many patients develop neuropsychological dysfunction with objective impairment of attention, memory and certain executive functions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely used in MTBI patients despite its proven greater sensitivity and specificity in comparison with computed tomography (CT). METHODS: The patient group consisted of 30 persons with MTBI and the control group consisted of 30 sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers. Both groups underwent neurological examination, neuropsychological testing (including the Postconcussion Symptoms Scale questionnaire, PCSS) and brain MRI (the patient group within 96 h after injury). RESULTS: The analyzed groups did not differ significantly in terms of sex, age, or level or duration of education. MRI pathological findings (traumatic and nonspecific) were present in nine patients. Traumatic lesions were found in seven patients. Nonspecific white matter lesions were found in five healthy controls. There were significant differences between MTBI patients and controls in terms of subjective symptoms (PCSS) and selected neuropsychological tests. Statistically significant neuropsychological differences were found between MTBI patients with true traumatic lesions and MTBI patients with nonspecific lesions. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that MTBI patients with true traumatic MRI lesions are neuropsychologically different from MTBI patients with nonspecific MRI lesions or normal brain MRI. These results support the hypothesis that some acute MTBI signs and symptoms have a real organic basis which can be detected by selected new MRI modalities.
INTRODUCTION: Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is a common neurological (neurotraumatological) diagnosis. As well as different subjective symptoms, many patients develop neuropsychological dysfunction with objective impairment of attention, memory and certain executive functions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely used in MTBI patients despite its proven greater sensitivity and specificity in comparison with computed tomography (CT). METHODS: The patient group consisted of 30 persons with MTBI and the control group consisted of 30 sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers. Both groups underwent neurological examination, neuropsychological testing (including the Postconcussion Symptoms Scale questionnaire, PCSS) and brain MRI (the patient group within 96 h after injury). RESULTS: The analyzed groups did not differ significantly in terms of sex, age, or level or duration of education. MRI pathological findings (traumatic and nonspecific) were present in nine patients. Traumatic lesions were found in seven patients. Nonspecific white matter lesions were found in five healthy controls. There were significant differences between MTBI patients and controls in terms of subjective symptoms (PCSS) and selected neuropsychological tests. Statistically significant neuropsychological differences were found between MTBI patients with true traumatic lesions and MTBI patients with nonspecific lesions. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that MTBI patients with true traumatic MRI lesions are neuropsychologically different from MTBI patients with nonspecific MRI lesions or normal brain MRI. These results support the hypothesis that some acute MTBI signs and symptoms have a real organic basis which can be detected by selected new MRI modalities.
Authors: Thierry A G M Huisman; A Gregory Sorensen; Klaus Hergan; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Pamela W Schaefer Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: P E Vos; L Battistin; G Birbamer; F Gerstenbrand; A Potapov; T Prevec; Ch A Stepan; P Traubner; A Twijnstra; L Vecsei; K von Wild Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: L O Wahlund; F Barkhof; F Fazekas; L Bronge; M Augustin; M Sjögren; A Wallin; H Ader; D Leys; L Pantoni; F Pasquier; T Erkinjuntti; P Scheltens Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Joseph Bleiberg; Alison N Cernich; Kenneth Cameron; Wenyu Sun; Karen Peck; P James Ecklund; Dennis Reeves; John Uhorchak; Molly B Sparling; Deborah L Warden Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Karen A Tong; Stephen Ashwal; Barbara A Holshouser; Joshua P Nickerson; Christopher J Wall; Lori A Shutter; Renatta J Osterdock; E M Haacke; Daniel Kido Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: David G Hughes; Alan Jackson; Damon L Mason; Elizabeth Berry; Sally Hollis; David W Yates Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2004-06-08 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Pamela W Schaefer; Thierry A G M Huisman; A Gregory Sorensen; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Lee H Schwamm Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-08-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: R L Mittl; R I Grossman; J F Hiehle; R W Hurst; D R Kauder; T A Gennarelli; G W Alburger Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Michael W Kirkwood; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Christopher Randolph; Michael McCrea; Vicki A Anderson Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Inga K Koerte; Alexander P Lin; Anna Willems; Marc Muehlmann; Jakob Hufschmidt; Michael J Coleman; Isobel Green; Huijun Liao; David F Tate; Elisabeth A Wilde; Ofer Pasternak; Sylvain Bouix; Yogesh Rathi; Erin D Bigler; Robert A Stern; Martha E Shenton Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Varan Govind; Stuart Gold; Krithica Kaliannan; Gaurav Saigal; Steven Falcone; Kristopher L Arheart; Leo Harris; Jonathan Jagid; Andrew A Maudsley Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Trevor C Wu; Elisabeth A Wilde; Erin D Bigler; Ragini Yallampalli; Stephen R McCauley; Maya Troyanskaya; Zili Chu; Xiaoqi Li; Gerri Hanten; Jill V Hunter; Harvey S Levin Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Mary R T Kennedy; Jeffrey R Wozniak; Ryan L Muetzel; Bryon A Mueller; Hsin-Huei Chiou; Kari Pantekoek; Kelvin O Lim Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Maria Chiara Ricciardi; Reinoud P H Bokkers; John A Butman; Dima A Hammoud; Dzung L Pham; Steven Warach; Lawrence L Latour Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Inga K Koerte; Vivian Schultz; Valerie J Sydnor; David R Howell; Jeffrey P Guenette; Emily Dennis; Janna Kochsiek; David Kaufmann; Nico Sollmann; Stefania Mondello; Martha E Shenton; Alexander P Lin Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 2.486