Literature DB >> 16785289

A randomized trial comparing long-term and short-term use of umbilical venous catheters in premature infants with birth weights of less than 1251 grams.

Meggan Butler-O'Hara1, Carol J Buzzard, Linda Reubens, Michael P McDermott, William DiGrazio, Carl T D'Angio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Umbilical vein and percutaneous central venous catheters are often used in preterm infants, but they can lead to complications, including infection.
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that long-term umbilical vein catheter use would result in fewer infections than short-term umbilical vein catheter use followed by percutaneous central venous catheter placement. DESIGN/
METHODS: Infants < or = 1250 g with umbilical vein catheters placed at admission were randomly assigned to a long-term (umbilical vein catheter up to 28 days) or short-term (umbilical vein catheter for 7-10 days followed by percutaneous central venous catheter) group. Catheter infection was defined as symptoms and > or = 1 positive blood culture for definite pathogens or >1 positive culture for other organisms, with a catheter in place. Clinically significant echocardiogram findings were defined as thrombi threatening vascular occlusion, crossing/blocking heart valves, or otherwise felt to be significant by the cardiologist. The primary outcome was time from birth to catheter infection, analyzed by the log-rank test.
RESULTS: There were 106 subjects in the short-term group and 104 in the long-term group with birth weights of 915 +/- 198 and 931 +/- 193 g and gestational ages of 27.8 +/- 2.0 and 27.7 +/- 2.2 weeks, respectively. The distribution of time to catheter infection did not differ between the groups. The overall incidence of catheter infection was 13% in the short-term group and 20% in the long-term group. Median age at catheter infection was 11.5 days in the short-term group and 14 days in the long-term group. There were 7.4 infections per 1000 catheter-days in the short-term group and 11.5 per 1000 in the long-term group. Seven infections in the short-term group were in umbilical vein catheters, and 18 infections in the long-term group were in umbilical vein catheter. Echocardiograms detected 4 infants in the short-term group and 7 infants in the long-term group with significant thrombosis. All significant thrombi were at the site of the umbilical vein catheter tip. No thrombus caused hemodynamic compromise, no child had clinical symptoms of thrombosis, and none required therapy. Of the 45 small-for-gestational-age infants in the study, 9 developed thrombi (short-term group, 4; long-term group, 5). The incidence of thrombi was higher in the small-for-gestational-age group (20%) versus other study subjects (9%). There were no differences in time to full feedings or to regain birth weight or in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis or death.
CONCLUSIONS: Infection and complication rates were similar between infants managed with an umbilical vein catheter in place for up to 28 days compared with infants managed with an umbilical vein catheter replaced by a percutaneous central venous catheter after 7 to 10 days. Umbilical vein catheter durations beyond the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended limit of 14 days may be reasonable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16785289     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  25 in total

1.  Skin-to-skin contact with an umbilical venous catheter: prospective evaluation in a level 3 unit.

Authors:  Zaoui-Grattepanche Catherine; Pindi Béatrice; Lapeyre Fabrice; Huart Claire; Duhamel Alain
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

Authors:  Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; Lillian A Burns; E Patchen Dellinger; Jeffrey Garland; Stephen O Heard; Pamela A Lipsett; Henry Masur; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne G Randolph; Mark E Rupp; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Comparison of methods and formulas used in umbilical venous catheter placement.

Authors:  Mehmet Mutlu; Burcu Küçükalioğlu Parıltan; Yakup Aslan; İlker Eyüpoğlu; Şebnem Kader; Filiz Acar Aktürk
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Adverse events associated with umbilical catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kim Gibson; Rebecca Sharp; Amanda Ullman; Scott Morris; Tricia Kleidon; Adrian Esterman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Epidemiology and outcomes of clinically unsuspected venous thromboembolism in children: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anjali A Sharathkumar; Tina Biss; Ketan Kulkarni; Sanjay Ahuja; Matt Regan; Christoph Male; Shoshana Revel-Vilk
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 6.  Central venous catheter-related thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Vidal; A Sharathkumar; J Glover; E V S Faustino
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  Risk factors for umbilical venous catheter-associated thrombosis in very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Shalu Narang; Jason Roy; Timothy P Stevens; Meggan Butler-O'Hara; Craig A Mullen; Carl T D'Angio
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Cardiomegaly in a premature neonate after venous umbilical catheterization.

Authors:  Luregn Jan Schlapbach; Jean-Pierre Pfammatter; Mathias Nelle; Felicity Jane McDougall
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 9.  Early planned removal of umbilical venous catheters to prevent infection in newborn infants.

Authors:  Adrienne Gordon; Mark Greenhalgh; William McGuire
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-10

Review 10.  A systematic review of the reporting of Data Monitoring Committees' roles, interim analysis and early termination in pediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  Ricardo M Fernandes; Johanna H van der Lee; Martin Offringa
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.