Literature DB >> 16784913

Clinical benefit of enoxaparin in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes without ST elevations in clinical practice.

Uwe Zeymer1, Anselm Gitt, Claus Jünger, Oliver Koeth, Ralf Zahn, Harm Wienbergen, Martin Gottwik, Jochen Senges.   

Abstract

In randomized clinical trials, low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin has been shown to decrease ischemic complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) without ST elevations who are treated conservatively. Enoxaparin has been shown to be equally effective as unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with an early invasive approach. Little is known about the use and efficacy of enoxaparin in unselected patients with non-ST-elevation ACSs in clinical practice. In a retrospective analysis of the prospective ACOS registry, we compared the outcome of patients who were >60 years of age with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina with ST-segment changes who were treated with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. In total, 4,806 patients (55%) with non-ST-elevation ACS fulfilled our inclusion criteria for this analysis; 1,178 (25%) were treated with enoxaparin and 3,628 (75%) with unfractionated heparin. There were no differences between groups in baseline characteristics. We observed a significant decrease in the combined end point of death or nonfatal reinfarction with enoxaparin in the entire study group (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.70) and in subgroups treated with early percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 1,333, odds ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.80), coronary artery bypass grafting during the index hospitalization (n = 270, odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 2.42), or conservatively (n = 3,203, odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.81). There was no significant increase in severe bleeding complications with enoxaparin (5.2% vs 4.5%). In conclusion, in clinical practice, in unselected high-risk patients with non-ST-elevation ACSs who are treated conservatively or with early percutaneous coronary intervention, early treatment with enoxaparin is associated with a significant decrease in the combined end point of in-hospital death and reinfarction, without a significant increase in severe bleeding complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16784913     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Administration of low molecular weight and unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Sadegh Ali-Hassan-Sayegh; Seyed Jalil Mirhosseini; Azadeh Shahidzadeh; Parisa Mahdavi; Mahbube Tahernejad; Fatemeh Haddad; Mohammad Reza Lotfaliani; Anton Sabashnikov; Aron-Frederik Popov
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-01-26

2.  Comparison of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pengcheng He; Yuanhui Liu; Xuebiao Wei; Lei Jiang; Wei Guo; Zhiqiang Guo; Chunying Lin; Ning Tan; Jiyan Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Johanne Silvain; Farzin Beygui; Olivier Barthélémy; Charles Pollack; Marc Cohen; Uwe Zeymer; Kurt Huber; Patrick Goldstein; Guillaume Cayla; Jean-Philippe Collet; Eric Vicaut; Gilles Montalescot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-02-03

Review 4.  Enoxaparin injection for the treatment of high-risk patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Caroline Schmidt-Lucke; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.