Literature DB >> 16784747

Closure vs. nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.

Zhu Yiyang1, Cai Qunxi, Wu Weiling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency and severity of celiac adhesions following cesarean sections performed with and without closure of the parietal and visceral peritoneum.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involved 612 women who underwent their second lower-segment transverse cesarean section.
RESULTS: Nonclosure of the parietal peritoneum at the time of the first cesarean section was associated with significantly more visceral adhesions than closure (16.2% vs. 8.1%; P=0.003), and closure of the visceral peritoneum had a similar effect (16.1% vs. 6.7%; P=0.02). However, the difference in rates of severe adhesions was not statistically significant (12.9% vs. 17.6%; P=0.12). After controlling for confounding variables, it was found that closure of the parietal peritoneum reduced the rate of visceral adhesions 2.7-fold. Trial of labor before and fever after surgery increased the risk of severe adhesions 6.1-fold and 5.6-fold, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Nonclosure of the peritoneum at primary cesarean section is associated with a significantly increased risk of visceral adhesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16784747     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  1 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Management of Adhesions Developed after Peritoneal Nonclosure in Primary Cesarean Section Delivery.

Authors:  Emaduldin Seyam; Emad Moussa Ibrahim; Ayman Moheb Youseff; Eissa M Khalifa; Enas Hefzy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2018-02-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.