Literature DB >> 16784345

Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action.

Brian S Lowery1, Miguel M Unzueta, Eric D Knowles, Phillip Atiba Goff.   

Abstract

The present experiments suggest that the desire to benefit the in-group drives dominant-group members' policy preferences, independent of concern for out-groups' outcomes. In Experiment 1, the effect of a manipulation of affirmative action procedures on policy support was mediated by how Whites expected the policy to affect fellow Whites, but not by the expected effect on minorities. In Experiments 2 and 3, when focused on losses for the White in-group, Whites' racial identity was negatively related to support for affirmative action. However, when focused on gains for the Black out-group or when participants were told that Whites were not affected by the policy, racial identity did not predict attitudes toward the policy. In Experiments 2 and 3, perceived fairness mediated these effects. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16784345     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  6 in total

1.  Chronic frames of social inequality: How mainstream media frame race, gender, and wealth inequality.

Authors:  Sora Jun; Rosalind M Chow; A Maurits van der Veen; Erik Bleich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Boundaries of American Identity: Relations between Ethnic Group Prototypicality and Policy Attitudes.

Authors:  Que-Lam Huynh; Thierry Devos; Hannah R Altman
Journal:  Polit Psychol       Date:  2015-08-01

3.  Race, ideology, and the tea party: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Eric D Knowles; Brian S Lowery; Elizabeth P Shulman; Rebecca L Schaumberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The (Biological or Cultural) Essence of Essentialism: Implications for Policy Support among Dominant and Subordinated Groups.

Authors:  Nur Soylu Yalcinkaya; Sara Estrada-Villalta; Glenn Adams
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-30

5.  If you rise, I fall: Equality is prevented by the misperception that it harms advantaged groups.

Authors:  N Derek Brown; Drew S Jacoby-Senghor; Isaac Raymundo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 14.957

6.  How to Break the Cycle of Low Workforce Diversity: A Model for Change.

Authors:  Katherine R O'Brien; Marten Scheffer; Egbert H van Nes; Romy van der Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.