Literature DB >> 16783857

Dose adjustment of allopurinol according to creatinine clearance does not provide adequate control of hyperuricemia in patients with gout.

Nicola Dalbeth1, Sunil Kumar, Lisa Stamp, Peter Gow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Published guidelines state that allopurinol doses should be adjusted according to creatinine clearance. We investigated whether such dosing provides adequate control of hyperuricemia.
METHODS: We studied 250 patients with gout attending rheumatology clinics in South Auckland from 2001 to 2004. Allopurinol dose, creatinine clearance, and serum uric acid (SUA) level were recorded. We analyzed the relationship between recommended allopurinol dose and SUA lowering to <or= 0.36 mmol/l.
RESULTS: For patients taking allopurinol, 70.9% were taking recommended doses, based on published allopurinol dosing guidelines. There were 4 (1.6%) patients with cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions to allopurinol, but none of these patients were taking higher than recommended allopurinol doses. The proportion of patients achieving SUA <or= 0.36 mmol/l was lower in those taking recommended doses, compared with those taking higher than recommended doses (19% vs 38.1%; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Adherence to published allopurinol dosing guidelines led to suboptimal control of hyperuricemia in this population of patients with gout. Further work is required to clarify the safety and efficacy of allopurinol dose escalation, particularly in patients with renal impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16783857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  70 in total

1.  Quality of care in patients with gout: why is management suboptimal and what can be done about it?

Authors:  N Lawrence Edwards
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  The pharmacokinetics of oxypurinol in people with gout.

Authors:  Sophie L Stocker; Andrew J McLachlan; Radojka M Savic; Carl M Kirkpatrick; Garry G Graham; Kenneth M Williams; Richard O Day
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Predicting allopurinol response in patients with gout.

Authors:  Daniel F B Wright; Stephen B Duffull; Tony R Merriman; Nicola Dalbeth; Murray L Barclay; Lisa K Stamp
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Restricting maintenance allopurinol dose according to kidney function in patients with gout is inappropriate!

Authors:  Lisa K Stamp; Daniel F B Wright; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Quality of life and quality of care for patients with gout.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 6.  A critical reappraisal of allopurinol dosing, safety, and efficacy for hyperuricemia in gout.

Authors:  Jeannie Chao; Robert Terkeltaub
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Febuxostat: the evidence for its use in the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout.

Authors:  Angelo L Gaffo; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 8.  Management of hyperuricemia in gout: focus on febuxostat.

Authors:  Mattheus K Reinders; Tim L Th A Jansen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  The urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat in the treatment of the hyperuricemia of gout: the CONFIRMS trial.

Authors:  Michael A Becker; H Ralph Schumacher; Luis R Espinoza; Alvin F Wells; Patricia MacDonald; Eric Lloyd; Christopher Lademacher
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  New advances in the treatment of gout: review of pegloticase.

Authors:  Mattheus K Reinders; Tim L Th A Jansen
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.