Literature DB >> 16783776

An evaluation of ThinPrep UroCyte filters for the preparation of slides for fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Benjamin R Kipp1, Michael B Campion, Erin Coffman, Arthur Smith, John D Tomisek, Gerry G Browne, Jeffrey R Panella, Rutuja Desai, Aaron R Harwood, Kevin C Halling.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of ThinPrep UroCyte filters, which were designed specifically for the preparation of slides for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of urine specimens. One hundred urine specimens were evenly split, and one portion was utilized to prepare a slide with the UroCyte filter method and the other portion was used to prepare a slide with a manual dropping method. All 17 of the 100 specimens identified as positive by the manual method were also identified as positive with the UroCyte method. No significant differences were noted in the percentage of chromosomally abnormal cells (P = 0.227), cellularity (P = 0.857), signal quality (P = 0.816), and DAPI counterstain quality (P = 0.369) between the two methodologies. The average time taken to prepare a batch of 10 slides using the UroCyte method, and that using manual method was 103 min (10.3 min/case) and 194 min (19.4 min/case), respectively. This study suggests that the UroCyte filter method of preparing slides for FISH analysis reduces the time required to prepare these slides with overall results that are similar to the currently utilized manual dropping method. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16783776     DOI: 10.1002/dc.20488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  4 in total

1.  Integrating a FISH imaging system into the cytology laboratory.

Authors:  G Denice Smith; Matt Riding; Kim Oswald; Joel S Bentz
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures.

Authors:  Michael J Levy; Todd H Baron; Amy C Clayton; Felicity B Enders; Christopher J Gostout; Kevin C Halling; Benjamin R Kipp; Bret T Petersen; Lewis R Roberts; Ashwin Rumalla; Thomas J Sebo; Mark D Topazian; Maurits J Wiersema; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Filtration Device for On-Site Collection, Storage and Shipment of Cells from Urine and Its Application to DNA-Based Detection of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Elin Andersson; Christina M Dahmcke; Kenneth Steven; Louise K Larsen; Per Guldberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Size-based enrichment of exfoliated tumor cells in urine increases the sensitivity for DNA-based detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Elin Andersson; Kenneth Steven; Per Guldberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.