AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The World Health Organization considers an aetiological classification of diabetes to be essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether HLA-DQB1 genotypes facilitate the classification of diabetes as compared with assessment of islet antibodies by investigating young adult diabetic patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were available at diagnosis for 1,872 (90%) of the 2,077 young adult patients (aged 15-34 years old) over a 5-year period in the nationwide Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden. Islet antibodies were measured at diagnosis in 1,869 patients, fasting plasma C-peptide (fpC-peptide) after diagnosis in 1,522, while HLA-DQB1 genotypes were determined in 1,743. RESULTS: Islet antibodies were found in 83% of patients clinically considered to have type 1 diabetes, 23% with type 2 diabetes and 45% with unclassifiable diabetes. After diagnosis, median fpC-peptide concentrations were markedly lower in patients with islet antibodies than in those without (0.24 vs 0.69 nmol/l, p<0.0001). Irrespective of clinical classification, patients with islet antibodies showed increased frequencies of at least one of the risk-associated HLA-DQB1 genotypes compared with patients without. Antibody-negative patients with risk-associated HLA-DQB1 genotypes had significantly lower median fpC-peptide concentrations than those without risk-associated genotypes (0.51 vs 0.74 nmol/l, p=0.0003). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Assessment of islet antibodies is necessary for the aetiological classification of diabetic patients. HLA-DQB1 genotyping does not improve the classification in patients with islet antibodies. However, in patients without islet antibodies, HLA-DQB1 genotyping together with C-peptide measurement may be of value in differentiating between idiopathic type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The World Health Organization considers an aetiological classification of diabetes to be essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether HLA-DQB1 genotypes facilitate the classification of diabetes as compared with assessment of islet antibodies by investigating young adult diabeticpatients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were available at diagnosis for 1,872 (90%) of the 2,077 young adult patients (aged 15-34 years old) over a 5-year period in the nationwide Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden. Islet antibodies were measured at diagnosis in 1,869 patients, fasting plasma C-peptide (fpC-peptide) after diagnosis in 1,522, while HLA-DQB1 genotypes were determined in 1,743. RESULTS: Islet antibodies were found in 83% of patients clinically considered to have type 1 diabetes, 23% with type 2 diabetes and 45% with unclassifiable diabetes. After diagnosis, median fpC-peptide concentrations were markedly lower in patients with islet antibodies than in those without (0.24 vs 0.69 nmol/l, p<0.0001). Irrespective of clinical classification, patients with islet antibodies showed increased frequencies of at least one of the risk-associated HLA-DQB1 genotypes compared with patients without. Antibody-negative patients with risk-associated HLA-DQB1 genotypes had significantly lower median fpC-peptide concentrations than those without risk-associated genotypes (0.51 vs 0.74 nmol/l, p=0.0003). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Assessment of islet antibodies is necessary for the aetiological classification of diabeticpatients. HLA-DQB1 genotyping does not improve the classification in patients with islet antibodies. However, in patients without islet antibodies, HLA-DQB1 genotyping together with C-peptide measurement may be of value in differentiating between idiopathic type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes.
Authors: M Landin-Olsson; H J Arnqvist; G Blohmé; B Littorin; F Lithner; L Nyström; B Scherstén; G Sundkvist; L Wibell; J Ostman; A Lernmark Journal: Autoimmunity Date: 1999 Impact factor: 2.815
Authors: F K Gorus; P Goubert; C Semakula; C L Vandewalle; J De Schepper; A Scheen; M R Christie; D G Pipeleers Journal: Diabetologia Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: G Sundkvist; W A Hagopian; M Landin-Olsson; A Lernmark; L Ohlsson; C Ericsson; J Ahlmén Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: A Schölin; L Björklund; H Borg; H Arnqvist; E Björk; G Blohmé; J Bolinder; J W Eriksson; S Gudbjörnsdottir; L Nyström; J Ostman; A F Karlsson; G Sundkvist Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: S Caillat-Zucman; H J Garchon; J Timsit; R Assan; C Boitard; I Djilali-Saiah; P Bougnères; J F Bach Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1992-12 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Gunnar Stenström; Bo Berger; Henrik Borg; Per Fernlund; Janice S Dorman; Göran Sundkvist Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: S Genovese; R Bonfanti; E Bazzigaluppi; V Lampasona; E Benazzi; E Bosi; G Chiumello; E Bonifacio Journal: Diabetologia Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: K Steen Carlsson; M Landin-Olsson; L Nyström; H J Arnqvist; J Bolinder; J Ostman; S Gudbjörnsdóttir Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-12-18 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Lin Yang; Shuoming Luo; Gan Huang; Jian Peng; Xia Li; Xiang Yan; Jian Lin; Janet M Wenzlau; Howard W Davidson; John C Hutton; Zhiguang Zhou Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: E Bakhtadze; C Cervin; E Lindholm; H Borg; P Nilsson; H J Arnqvist; J Bolinder; J W Eriksson; S Gudbjörnsdottir; L Nyström; C-D Agardh; M Landin-Olsson; G Sundkvist; L C Groop Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Dana Dabelea; Catherine Pihoker; Jennifer W Talton; Ralph B D'Agostino; Wilfred Fujimoto; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Jean M Lawrence; Barbara Linder; Santica M Marcovina; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Giuseppina Imperatore; Lawrence M Dolan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 19.112