Literature DB >> 16782969

Stillbirth and slow metabolizers of caffeine: comparison by genotypes.

Bodil Hammer Bech1, Herman Autrup, Ellen Aagaard Nohr, Tine Brink Henriksen, Jørn Olsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) and N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) are key enzymes in the metabolism of caffeine. The polymorphism of these genes facilitates the detection of fast and slow metabolizers, and if caffeine is causally related to stillbirth, we expect slow metabolizers to have a higher risk of stillbirth at any given intake of caffeine. Gluthatione S-transferase alpha1 (GSTA1) may also be active in the metabolism of caffeine as it conjugates glutathione to aromatic amines. Our study, therefore, included analyses of the association between GSTA1 and stillbirth.
METHODS: A nested case non-case study among women who participated in the Danish National Birth Cohort: 142 cases of singleton stillbirths and 157 controls of singleton live births.
RESULTS: Slow oxidizer status (CYP1A2), slow acetylator status (NAT2), and low activity of GSTA1 were not individually associated with the risk of stillbirth [odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.67-1.67, OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.60-1.51, and OR = 1.42, 95% CI 0.88-2.28, respectively]. We did, however, observe that subjects with a combination of slow CYP1A2, slow NAT2, and low GSTA1 genes had almost a 2-fold risk of stillbirth compared with subjects with other combinations of genotypes.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no link between any single genotype and the risk of stillbirth. An association between a combination of genotypes and stillbirth was discovered. Caffeine may be causally related to stillbirth, but larger studies using Mendelian randomization are needed to verify this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16782969     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyl116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  5 in total

1.  Glutathione S-transferase A1 polymorphism and the risk of recurrent spontaneous abortion in Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Chen Zong; Yanwei Sha; Huifen Xiang; Jing Wang; Dawei Chen; Juan Liu; Binbin Wang; Yunxia Cao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Usefulness of Mendelian randomization in observational epidemiology.

Authors:  Murielle Bochud; Valentin Rousson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy and risk of obesity in offspring: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  D-K Li; J R Ferber; R Odouli
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 4.  Mendelian randomisation approaches to the study of prenatal exposures: A systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Diemer; Jeremy A Labrecque; Alexander Neumann; Henning Tiemeier; Sonja A Swanson
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 5.  Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Daniel I Swerdlow; Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; Sonia Shah; Reecha Sofat; Michael V Holmes; Jon White; Jennifer S Mindell; Mika Kivimaki; Eric J Brunner; John C Whittaker; Juan P Casas; Aroon D Hingorani
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 7.196

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.