Literature DB >> 16782925

Utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging staging before completion lymphadenectomy in patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma.

Thomas A Aloia1, Jeffrey E Gershenwald, Robert H Andtbacka, Marcella M Johnson, Christopher W Schacherer, Chaan S Ng, Janice N Cormier, Jeffrey E Lee, Merrick I Ross, Paul F Mansfield.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although melanoma patients with regional nodal metastases are frequently imaged with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, the efficacy of routine radiologic staging in asymptomatic patients with microscopic nodal involvement has not been established. To determine the utility of this approach, we analyzed the incidence of synchronous distant metastases (SDM) detected by CT or MRI of the head, chest, and abdomen in a large group of patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) -positive melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Positive SLNs were identified in 314 (16.2%) of the 1,934 melanoma patients who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy at our institution from 1996 to 2003. Within 3 months of sentinel lymphadenectomy, 270 (86.0%) of the 314 SLN-positive patients were radiologically staged. To determine which prognostic factors were associated with SDM, associations between final staging outcomes and clinicopathologic variables, including SLN tumor burden, were analyzed.
RESULTS: CT and/or MRI scans identified lesions that were suspicious for SDM in 23 (8.6%) of the 270 patients who underwent staging. In eight of these patients, further diagnostic studies determined that these abnormalities were benign. The remaining 15 suspicious lesions were percutaneously biopsied (10 negative and five positive), yielding a radiologically detectable SDM rate of 1.9%. Detection of SDM was associated with primary tumor thickness (P = .011), ulceration (P = .018), and SLN tumor burden (P = .018).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the vast majority of asymptomatic patients with a new diagnosis of microscopic SLN-positive melanoma do not harbor radiologically detectable SDM and can proceed to completion lymph node dissection without immediate CT or MRI staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16782925     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.6176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

1.  Management of regional lymph node basins in melanoma.

Authors:  Timothy P Love; Keith A Delman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

2.  Prediction of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) positivity in patients with high-risk primary melanoma.

Authors:  Maria Danielsen; Andreas Kjaer; Max Wu; Lea Martineau; Mehdi Nosrati; Stanley Pl Leong; Richard W Sagebiel; James R Miller; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-09-22

3.  Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xing; Yulia Bronstein; Merrick I Ross; Robert L Askew; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Utility of 3-year torso computed tomography and head imaging in asymptomatic patients with high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Erin R DeRose; Alexander Pleet; Wei Wang; Virginia J Seery; Mee Young Lee; Sharon Renzi; Ryan J Sullivan; Michael B Atkins
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Treatment of cutaneous melanoma: current approaches and future prospects.

Authors:  Alain P Algazi; Christopher W Soon; Adil I Daud
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Seau Tak Cheung; Paul Nathan; Rubeta N Matin; Naomi Chuchu; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan E Bayliss; Abha Gulati; Lopa Patel; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Manil Subesinghe; Zoe Traill; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 7.  Staging of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  P Mohr; A M M Eggermont; A Hauschild; A Buzaid
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Melanoma m (zero): diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Marco Rastrelli; Mauro Alaibac; Roberto Stramare; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Maria Cristina Montesco; Antonella Vecchiato; Luca Giovanni Campana; Carlo Riccardo Rossi
Journal:  ISRN Dermatol       Date:  2013-04-11

9.  High frequency of brain metastases after adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Wolfram E Samlowski; James Moon; Merle Witter; Michael B Atkins; John M Kirkwood; Megan Othus; Antoni Ribas; Vernon K Sondak; Lawrence E Flaherty
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Melanoma Radiological Surveillance: A Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Challenges.

Authors:  Matthew David Howard
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2020-03-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.