Literature DB >> 16782734

Estimating the cost and health status consequences of treatment with TNF antagonists in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

N J Bansback1, R Ara, N Barkham, A Brennan, A D Fraser, P Conway, A Reynolds, P Emery.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has been shown to improve the outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We estimate the long-term impact on health status of prescribing the TNF antagonist etanercept, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness in a health economic model.
METHODS: The relationship between disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and health state utility was explored to estimate the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the TNF antagonist etanercept. A model was then used to compare sequences of treatments for PsA after failure of two conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). One arm commences on etanercept therapy and this is compared with a strategy commencing with combination therapy of methotrexate and ciclosporin and another commencing with leflunomide. Individual patient data from Phase III etanercept trials is used to populate the model supported by published evidence from extensive literature searches. By incorporating a life table specific for a PsA population, and using a number of evidence- and expert opinion-based assumptions for disease progression, the model was extended beyond the trial duration to a 10-yr time horizon. Cost offsets were produced by avoiding surgery through delayed progression; drug and monitoring costs were also modelled.
RESULTS: Over the 10 yrs, modelled etanercept treatment gave 0.82 more QALYs when compared with combination therapy with methotrexate and ciclosporin, and 0.65 more QALYs in comparison with leflunomide. This equates to a central estimate for the cost per QALY of pound28 189 and pound28 189 for ciclosporin and leflunomide, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated this could vary by as much as +/-28%.
CONCLUSIONS: With limited data currently available, the potential cost-effectiveness of etanercept in DMARD failures for adults with PsA appears encouraging. The result for other TNF antagonists will depend on how their relative efficacy and drug price compares with etanercept. A number of limitations are described and priorities for further research suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16782734     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  10 in total

1.  The comparative effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy and methotrexate in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 6 month results from a longitudinal, observational, multicentre study.

Authors:  M S Heiberg; C Kaufmann; E Rødevand; K Mikkelsen; W Koldingsnes; P Mowinckel; T K Kvien
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  High rate of disease remission in moderate rheumatoid arthritis on etanercept therapy: data from GISEA, the Italian biologics register.

Authors:  Florenzo Iannone; Elisa Gremese; Gaia Gallo; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Costantino Botsios; Francesco Trotta; Stefania Gasperini; Mauro Galeazzi; Silvano Adami; Fabrizio Cantini; Marco Sebastiani; Roberto Gorla; Antonio Marchesoni; Annarita Giardina; Rosario Foti; Angiola Mele; Eleonora Bruschi; Gianluca Bagnato; Gian Luca Erre; Giovanni Lapadula
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Understanding the relationship between the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HAQ and disease activity in inflammatory arthritis.

Authors:  Roisin Adams; Cathal Walsh; Douglas Veale; Barry Bresnihan; Oliver FitzGerald; Michael Barry
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Psoriatic arthritis: pharmacoeconomic considerations.

Authors:  Ignazio Olivieri; Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani; Salvatore D'Angelo; Angela Padula; Simona de Portu
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Update on the treatment of peripheral arthritis in psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Enrique R Soriano; Javier Rosa
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Disease burden of psoriatic arthritis compared to rheumatoid arthritis, Hungarian experiment.

Authors:  Valentin Brodszky; Péter Bálint; Pál Géher; László Hodinka; Gábor Horváth; Éva Koó; Márta Péntek; Anna Polgár; Magdolna Seszták; Sándor Szántó; Ilona Ujfalussy; László Gulácsi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Limited correlation between the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and EuroQol in rheumatoid arthritis: questionable validity of deriving quality adjusted life years from HAQ.

Authors:  D L Scott; B Khoshaba; E H Choy; G H Kingsley
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  Economic burden of psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Christoph Ackermann; Arthur Kavanaugh
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  EQ-5D in skin conditions: an assessment of validity and responsiveness.

Authors:  Yaling Yang; John Brazier; Louise Longworth
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-10-31

10.  The psoriatic arthritis cost evaluation study: a cost-of-illness study on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis patients with inadequate response to conventional therapy.

Authors:  I Olivieri; S de Portu; C Salvarani; A Cauli; E Lubrano; A Spadaro; F Cantini; M S Cutro; A Mathieu; M Matucci-Cerinic; N Pappone; L Punzi; R Scarpa; L G Mantovani
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 7.580

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.