Literature DB >> 16782427

Pancreatic anastomotic leak after the Whipple procedure is reduced using the surgical microscope.

Keita Wada1, L William Traverso.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic anastomotic leakage (Leak) is the most common major complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In this study we tested the hypothesis that better vision would improve the technical performance of this anastomosis and result in a lower Leak rate.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 266 consecutive patients who underwent PD with pancreaticojejunostomy between 1996 and 2003 was carried out. In the first 196 patients we had used an end-to-side, internally-stented, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy aided by surgical Loupes at 2.5x magnification (Loupes group). In the next 70 patients we substituted the surgical microscope at 12.5x for the surgical Loupes (microscope group). Risk factors associated with Leak were determined for all 266 cases and then the outcomes for each group were compared.
RESULTS: Leak was observed in 11.7% of patients (31 of 266). Uni- and multivariate analysis showed 3 independent risk factors for Leak: (1) male gender (odds ratio [OR], 3.10); (2) a pancreatic duct size of less than or equal to 3 mm (OR, 7.75); and (3) not using the microscope (OR, 7.43). The Leak rate in the Loupes group was 15% (29 of 196) and in the microscope group 2.9% (2 of 70, P = .008). The mean hospital length of stay was longer in the Loupes group (11.3 days) as compared to the microscope group (9.0 days, P < .001). In the high-risk subset for Leak with duct size less than or equal to 3 mm (n = 147), the Leak rate was 23% in the Loupes group vs 4.2% in the microscope group (P = .027).
CONCLUSION: The enhanced vision provided by the surgical microscope allowed precise construction of the anastomosis resulting in a significant decrease in Leak, particularly when a patient was at risk for Leak, ie, pancreatic duct less than or equal to 3 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16782427     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  23 in total

1.  Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Daniel J Moskovic; Sally E Hodges; Meng-Fen Wu; F Charles Brunicardi; Susan G Hilsenbeck; William E Fisher
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Analysis of clinical trials evaluating complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a new era of pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Video-microscopy for use in microsurgical aspects of complex hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Nicholas N Nissen; Vijay Menon; James Williams; George Berci
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Pancreatoduodenectomy - preventing complications.

Authors:  Prasanth Penumadu; Savio G Barreto; Mahesh Goel; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-19

5.  Modified Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy: technical improvement in matched historical control study.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Suguru Yamada; Mitsuro Kanda; Masaya Suenaga; Hideki Takami; Masashi Hattori; Yoshikuni Inokawa; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?--an analysis in 244 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Motoki Miyazawa; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: evolving definitions, preventive strategies and modern management.

Authors:  Shailesh-V Shrikhande; Melroy-A D'Souza
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  An easier method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy for the soft pancreas using a fast-absorbable suture.

Authors:  Kenichi Hakamada; Shunji Narumi; Yoshikazu Toyoki; Masaki Nara; Kenosuke Ishido; Takuya Miura; Norihito Kubo; Mutsuo Sasaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Preoperative liver function tests and hemoglobin will predict complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Christopher Hughes; Michael G Hurtuk; Karen Rychlik; Margo Shoup; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical predictors and patient outcomes.

Authors:  C Max Schmidt; Jennifer Choi; Emilie S Powell; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; Henry A Pitt; Eric A Wiebke; James A Madura; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2009-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.