Literature DB >> 16782245

Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.

Alexandra Schwartz1, Richard Oka, Tim Odell, Andrew Mahar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures are relatively uncommon injuries but are fraught with poor outcomes such as malunion, elbow stiffness and deformity. Various types of internal fixation screw-plate constructs have been developed to improve fixation. Specifically, a 90 degrees offset periarticular system lowers the profile on the lateral epicondyle, yet it is unclear how this design compares to other plate constructs. This study compared the mechanical stiffness and plate surface strains between two types of constructs for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
METHODS: Identical bi-columnar segmental intra-articular fractures were created in ten epoxy composite left humeri. Models were randomly assigned to two groups (n=5/group) with either parallel plates or perpendicular plates. Rosette strain gages were placed at the most distal possible space on the lateral plate for both constructs. Models were mechanically tested with estimates of physiologic loads in flexion, extension, varus, valgus axial compression and axial torsion. Data for mechanical stiffness, transverse plate strain and longitudinal plate strain were compared with a one-way ANOVA (P<0.05).
FINDINGS: There was no statistical difference in stiffness in any direction. The longitudinal strain for the 90 degrees construct was significantly lower in axial compression. The 180 degrees system demonstrated significantly lower transverse strains during axial torsion.
INTERPRETATION: Both systems demonstrated similar mechanical stiffness theoretically providing similar fracture stabilization. Plate strain differences may affect fragment position, but it is unclear how much plate loading occurs in vivo. Surgeon experience and preference may dictate the choice of a plate construct for this fracture configuration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16782245     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  17 in total

1.  Bicolumnar 90-90 plating of low-energy distal humeral fractures in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Daniel F Leigey; Dana J Farrell; Peter A Siska; Ivan S Tarkin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

2.  Biomechanical study of different plate configurations for distal humerus osteosynthesis.

Authors:  M Bogataj; F Kosel; R Norris; M Krkovic; M Brojan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Outcomes of distal humerus diaphyseal injuries fixed with a single-column anatomic plate.

Authors:  John T Capo; Monika P Debkowska; Frank Liporace; Bryan G Beutel; Eitan Melamed
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus-a review of the current practice.

Authors:  Charalampos G Zalavras; Efthymios Papasoulis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Parallel versus orthogonal plate osteosynthesis of adult distal humerus fractures: a meta-analysis of biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Chien-An Shih; Wei-Ren Su; Wei-Chin Lin; Tai-Wei Tai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of the surgical treatment of complex AO type C distal humeral fractures with two different double plate fixation techniques.

Authors:  K Ditsios; S I Stavridis; P Savvidis; H Dinopoulos; G Petsatodis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

7.  Biomechanical testing of a new plate system for the distal humerus compared to two well-established implants.

Authors:  Christine Voigt; Christina Rank; Klaus Waizner; Robert Wendlandt; Andreas Unger; Arndt P Schulz; Christian Jürgens; Felix Renken
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The role of locking technology in the upper extremity.

Authors:  Siddharth B Joglekar; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2010-01-08

9.  A comparison between orthogonal and parallel plating methods for distal humerus fractures: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Sang Ki Lee; Kap Jung Kim; Kyung Hoon Park; Won Sik Choy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-07

10.  Clinico-radiological Outcome Analysis of Parallel Plating with Perpendicular Plating in Distal Humeral Intra-articular Fractures: Prospective Randomised Study.

Authors:  Ramachandran Govindasamy; Vishal Shekhawat; Ramesh Chandra Banshiwal; Rajender Kumar Verma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.