| Literature DB >> 16781437 |
Abstract
This study compares the efficacy of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated press-fit stems versus porous coated press-fit stems with a minimum 2-year follow up. Of the 1152 patients in the study, 69 had an HA-coated grit blasted cemented stem inserted (6%), whereas 1083 (94%) had a porous coated stem inserted. A detailed clinical and radiographic analysis demonstrated that there was no clinical difference at an average 4-year follow up. Similarly, there was no radiographic difference when the HA group was compared with the porous coated group. Thus, there is no need for HA coating on a tapered titanium stem in primary total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16781437 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757