Literature DB >> 16781437

Tapered hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit stems: any added value?

Cecil H Rorabeck1.   

Abstract

This study compares the efficacy of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated press-fit stems versus porous coated press-fit stems with a minimum 2-year follow up. Of the 1152 patients in the study, 69 had an HA-coated grit blasted cemented stem inserted (6%), whereas 1083 (94%) had a porous coated stem inserted. A detailed clinical and radiographic analysis demonstrated that there was no clinical difference at an average 4-year follow up. Similarly, there was no radiographic difference when the HA group was compared with the porous coated group. Thus, there is no need for HA coating on a tapered titanium stem in primary total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781437     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  2 in total

1.  A short-term follow-up study of a surgeon-customised fully-coated hydroxyapatite femoral stem using a nation-wide joint registry.

Authors:  Aneesh Dave; Bob Jang; Warwick Bruce
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-02-28

2.  Does hydroxyapatite coating have no advantage over porous coating in primary total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Lin Chen; Tiao Lin; An Liu; Ming-Min Shi; Bin Hu; Zhong-Li Shi; Shi-Gui Yan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.