Literature DB >> 16781412

Component exchange in treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Alexander Katzer1, Akif Ince, Joachim Wodtke, Jochen F Loehr.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of 893 consecutive periprosthetic femoral fractures treated between 1976 and 2001 shows that component exchange with reimplantation of a cemented long-stem implant can be considered a reliable method of treatment with good functional results and low rates of complications (10%) and revision (7.5%). The possibility of increasing the degree of weight bearing postoperatively at an early stage or even immediate full weight bearing (25%) greatly facilitates mobilization of the mostly elderly and fragile patients. Evaluation according to the Harris Hip Score of the operation and rehabilitation results of a representative sample of 120 patients shows an average value of 85 after a mean period of 6.4 years. The patients' own rating is correspondingly high. In the authors' view, stem exchange is currently the method of choice in the majority of cases because of the rather high rate of stem loosening (77%) at the time of operation, the age-related frequently poor quality or loss of bone substance, and the possibility that the implant material may be damaged. The fact that more than one third of the fractures occurred without significant trauma underlines the importance of this injury as a possible sign of previously unrecognized osteolysis and weakening of the bone as a result of loosening of the prosthesis stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781412     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  The value of a standardized and reproducible surgical technique in treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures: our experience.

Authors:  Stefano Biggi; Andrea Camera; Riccardo Tedino; Andrea Capuzzo; Stefano Tornago
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate.

Authors:  Mauro Spina; Andrea Scalvi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-21

3.  [Patients with periprosthetic femur fractures and consecutive stem replacement. Analysis of survival, complications, and quality of life].

Authors:  R Langenhan; P Trobisch; B Hohendorff; M Baumann; A Probst
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem: overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  Andrew N Fleischman; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

5.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sung Ki Park; Young Gun Kim; Shin Yoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-05-12

6.  Body mass characteristics of hip osteoarthritis patients experiencing aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fractures, dislocation, and infections after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ray Marks
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2009-05-15

7.  Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases.

Authors:  Toby W Briant-Evans; Darmaraja Veeramootoo; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Matthew J Hubble
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.