Literature DB >> 16781401

The effect of the "mini" incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position.

Jaroslava Svoboda Teet1, Harry B Skinner, Loren Khoury.   

Abstract

This study compares cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasties performed through either a standard or mini incision. The parameters evaluated were dislocation rates, Gruen and DeLee zones, Barrack cement grading, component positioning, and heterotopic bone levels. There were no statistically significant differences found between the mini and standard incision groups except in 2 parameters. Analysis of femoral stems not in neutral position revealed statistically significant differences between cemented and uncemented stems. The mean anteversion of the mini incision cup was also significantly less than the standard group, although probably not clinically significant. In conclusion, the mini incision does not compromise total hip arthroplasty results on the acetabular side, but varus positioning of the cemented femoral component nearing 2 degrees is concerning for the long-term success of these arthroplasties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781401     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Cheng; J G Feng; T Liu; X L Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty - trend or state of the art?: A meta-analysis].

Authors:  T Kappe; R Bieger; D Wernerus; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Antonia F Chen; Chi-Lung Chen; Sara Low; Wei-Ming Lin; Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu; Fabio R Orozco; Alvin C Ong; Zachary D Post
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-19

4.  Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Two-incisions direct anterior approach for THR: Surgical technique and early outcome.

Authors:  Ritesh Rathi; Idriss Tourabaly; Alexis Nogier
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-28

6.  Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers.

Authors:  Patrick F Bergin; Jason D Doppelt; Curtis J Kephart; Michael T Benke; James H Graeter; Andrew S Holmes; Hana Haleem-Smith; Rocky S Tuan; Anthony S Unger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Varus stem positioning does not affect long-term functional outcome in cementless anatomical total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Remy Coulomb; Alexandre Laborde; Vincent Haignère; François Bauzou; Philippe Marchand; Pascal Kouyoumdjian
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Stylianos Tottas; Athanasios Ververidis; Ioannis Kougioumtzis; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Christina Tsigalou; Makrina Karaglani; Georgios Drosos
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-02

9.  Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted total hip arthroplasty versus lateral approach in Total Hip Replacement. A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Stylianos Tottas; Christina Tsigalou; Athanasios Ververidis; Ioannis E Kougioumtzis; Makrina Karaglani; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Christos Chatzipapas; Georgios I Drosos
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-16

10.  Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jon H M Goosen; Boudewijn J Kollen; René M Castelein; Bart M Kuipers; Cees C Verheyen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.